Pankow W, Podszus T, Gutheil T, Penzel T, Peter J, Von Wichert P
Department of Internal Medicine, Medizinische Poliklinik, Schlafmedizinisches Labor, Philipps-University Marburg, D-32033 Marburg, Germany.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Oct;85(4):1236-43. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.4.1236.
Breathing at very low lung volumes might be affected by decreased expiratory airflow and air trapping. Our purpose was to detect expiratory flow limitation (EFL) and, as a consequence, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) in grossly obese subjects (OS). Eight OS with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 44 +/- 5 kg/m2 and six age-matched normal-weight control subjects (CS) were studied in different body positions. Negative expiratory pressure (NEP) was used to determine EFL. In contrast to CS, EFL was found in two of eight OS in the upright position and in seven of eight OS in the supine position. Dynamic PEEPi and mean transdiaphragmatic pressure (mean Pdi) were measured in all six CS and in six of eight OS. In OS, PEEPi increased from 0.14 +/- 0.06 (SD) kPa in the upright position to 0.41 +/- 0.11 kPa in the supine position (P < 0.05) and decreased to 0.20 +/- 0.08 kPa in the right lateral position (P < 0.05, compared with supine), whereas, in CS, PEEPi was significantly smaller (<0.05 kPa) in each position. In OS, mean Pdi in each position was significantly larger compared with CS. Mean Pdi increased from 1.02 +/- 0.32 kPa in the upright position to 1.26 +/- 0.17 kPa in the supine position (not significant) and decreased to 1. 06 +/- 0.26 kPa in the right lateral position (P < 0.05, compared with supine), whereas there were no significant changes in CS. We conclude that in OS 1) tidal breathing can be affected by EFL and PEEPi; 2) EFL and PEEPi are promoted by the supine posture; and 3) the increased diaphragmatic load in the supine position is, in part, related to PEEPi.
在肺容积非常低的情况下呼吸可能会受到呼气气流减少和气体陷闭的影响。我们的目的是检测严重肥胖受试者(OS)中的呼气气流受限(EFL)以及由此产生的内源性呼气末正压(PEEPi)。对8名平均体重指数(BMI)为44±5kg/m²的OS和6名年龄匹配的正常体重对照受试者(CS)在不同体位下进行了研究。使用呼气负压(NEP)来确定EFL。与CS相比,在直立位时8名OS中有2名发现存在EFL,在仰卧位时8名OS中有7名存在EFL。对所有6名CS以及8名OS中的6名测量了动态PEEPi和平均跨膈压(平均Pdi)。在OS中,PEEPi从直立位时的0.14±0.06(标准差)kPa增加到仰卧位时的0.41±0.11kPa(P<0.05),在右侧卧位时降至0.20±0.08kPa(与仰卧位相比,P<0.05),而在CS中,每个体位下的PEEPi均显著较小(<0.05kPa)。在OS中,每个体位下的平均Pdi均显著高于CS。平均Pdi从直立位时的1.02±0.32kPa增加到仰卧位时的1.26±0.17kPa(无显著差异),在右侧卧位时降至1.06±0.26kPa(与仰卧位相比,P<0.05),而CS中无显著变化。我们得出结论,在OS中:1)潮气呼吸会受到EFL和PEEPi的影响;2)仰卧位会促进EFL和PEEPi;3)仰卧位时膈肌负荷增加部分与PEEPi有关。