Placidi G, Alecci M, Colacicchi S, Sotgiu A
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biomediche, Universitá dell'Aquila, Via Vetoio 10, L'Aquila, 67010, Italy.
J Magn Reson. 1998 Oct;134(2):280-6. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1998.1495.
The qualitative equivalence between the Fourier reconstruction (FR) algorithm and the filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm is demonstrated when all the different phase errors that can occur in FR are eliminated. The causes of phase errors are underlined and methods to eliminate them are presented. The practical comparison between FR and FBP has been evaluated on a numerical test image and the results are reported, demonstrating the qualitative equivalence. FR has the advantage of being very computationally efficient. In fact, the time spent to obtain the FR image was 1/20 of that used to obtain the FBP image. Because of the computational efficiency of FR and the good quality of the results obtained, an iterative version of FR has been used to implement the spectral-spatial imaging (SSI) algorithm in the field of electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (EPRI). An experimental example, demonstrating its good performance, is reported.
当消除了傅里叶重建(FR)算法中可能出现的所有不同相位误差时,证明了傅里叶重建(FR)算法与滤波反投影(FBP)算法之间的定性等效性。强调了相位误差的原因,并提出了消除它们的方法。在数值测试图像上评估了FR和FBP之间的实际比较,并报告了结果,证明了定性等效性。FR具有计算效率非常高的优点。事实上,获得FR图像所花费的时间是获得FBP图像所用时间的1/20。由于FR的计算效率和所获得结果的良好质量,FR的迭代版本已被用于在电子顺磁共振成像(EPRI)领域实现光谱空间成像(SSI)算法。报告了一个展示其良好性能的实验示例。