Tucker B P
Hastings Cent Rep. 1998 Jul-Aug;28(4):6-14.
The use of cochlear implants, especially for prelingually deafened children, has aroused heated debate. Members and proponents of Deaf culture vigorously oppose implants both as a seriously invasive treatment of dubious efficacy and as a threat to Deaf culture. Some find these arguments persuasive; others do not. And in this context arise questions about the extent to which individuals with disabilities may decline treatments to ameliorate disabling conditions. When they do so, to what extent may they call upon society to provide supportive services and accommodations?
人工耳蜗的使用,尤其是对于语前聋儿童的使用,引发了激烈的争论。聋人文化的成员及支持者坚决反对植入,理由是这是一种疗效存疑的严重侵入性治疗,也是对聋人文化的一种威胁。一些人觉得这些论点很有说服力;另一些人则不然。在这种背景下,出现了一些问题,即残疾人在多大程度上可以拒绝改善残疾状况的治疗。当他们这样做时,他们在多大程度上可以要求社会提供支持性服务和便利设施?