Lane Harlan
Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005 Summer;10(3):291-310. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eni030. Epub 2005 May 4.
This article is concerned with ethical aspects of the relations between language minorities using signed languages (called the Deaf-World) and the larger societies that engulf them. The article aims to show that such minorities have the properties of ethnic groups, and that an unsuitable construction of the Deaf-World as a disability group has led to programs of the majority that discourage Deaf children from acquiring the language and culture of the Deaf-World and that aim to reduce the number of Deaf births-programs that are unethical from an ethnic group perspective. Four reasons not to construe the Deaf-World as a disability group are advanced: Deaf people themselves do not believe they have a disability; the disability construction brings with it needless medical and surgical risks for the Deaf child; it also endangers the future of the Deaf-World; finally, the disability construction brings bad solutions to real problems because it is predicated on a misunderstanding.
本文关注使用手语的语言少数群体(即聋人群体)与将他们纳入其中的更大社会之间关系的伦理层面。本文旨在表明,这样的少数群体具有族群的属性,并且将聋人群体不当建构为残疾群体导致了多数群体的一些项目,这些项目阻碍聋儿习得聋人群体的语言和文化,并且旨在减少聋儿出生数量——从族群角度来看,这些项目是不道德的。提出了四条不将聋人群体建构为残疾群体的理由:聋人自己并不认为他们有残疾;残疾建构给聋儿带来了不必要的医疗和手术风险;它还危及聋人群体的未来;最后,残疾建构因为基于误解而给实际问题带来了糟糕的解决方案。