Bender R, Grouven U
Department of Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;51(10):809-16. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00066-3.
The proportional odds model (POM) is the most popular logistic regression model for analyzing ordinal response variables. However, violation of the main model assumption can lead to invalid results. This is demonstrated by application of this method to data of a study investigating the effect of smoking on diabetic retinopathy. Since the proportional odds assumption is not fulfilled, separate binary logistic regression models are used for dichotomized response variables based upon cumulative probabilities. This approach is compared with polytomous logistic regression and the partial proportional odds model. The separate binary logistic regression approach is slightly less efficient than a joint model for the ordinal response. However, model building, investigating goodness-of-fit, and interpretation of the results is much easier for binary responses. The careful application of separate binary logistic regressions represents a simple and adequate tool to analyze ordinal data with non-proportional odds.
比例优势模型(POM)是用于分析有序响应变量的最流行的逻辑回归模型。然而,违反主要模型假设可能会导致无效结果。将该方法应用于一项研究吸烟对糖尿病视网膜病变影响的数据时,就证明了这一点。由于未满足比例优势假设,因此基于累积概率将单独的二元逻辑回归模型用于二分响应变量。将这种方法与多分类逻辑回归和部分比例优势模型进行比较。对于有序响应,单独的二元逻辑回归方法的效率略低于联合模型。但是,对于二元响应,模型构建、拟合优度研究和结果解释要容易得多。仔细应用单独的二元逻辑回归是分析具有非比例优势的有序数据的一种简单且合适的工具。