• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1995年在美国进行输精管切除术的临床情况。

Clinical aspects of vasectomies performed in the United States in 1995.

作者信息

Haws J M, Morgan G T, Pollack A E, Koonin L M, Magnani R J, Gargiullo P M

机构信息

AVSC International, New York, New York 10016, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 1998 Oct;52(4):685-91. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00274-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00274-x
PMID:9763094
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Currently, no surveillance system collects data on the numbers and characteristics of vasectomies performed annually in the United States. This study provides nationwide data on the numbers of vasectomies and the use of no-scalpel vasectomy, various occlusion methods, fascial interposition, and protocols for analyzing semen after vasectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective mail survey (with telephone follow-up) was conducted of 1800 urology, family practice, and general surgery practices drawn from the American Medical Association's Physician Master File and stratified by specialty and census region. Mail survey and telephone follow-up yielded an 88% response rate.

RESULTS

In 1995, approximately 494,000 vasectomies are estimated to have been performed by 15,800 physicians in the United States. Urologists performed 76% of all vasectomies, and nearly all (93%) urology practices performed vasectomies in 1995. Nearly one third (29%) of vasectomies in 1995 were no-scalpel vasectomies, and 37% of physicians performing no-scalpel vasectomies taught themselves the procedure. The most common occlusion method in 1995 (used for 38% of all vasectomies) was concurrent use of ligation and cautery. In 1995, slightly less than half (48%) of all physicians surveyed interposed the fascial sheath over one end of the vas when performing a vasectomy. Protocols for ensuring azoospermia varied: 56% of physicians required one postvasectomy semen specimen; 39% required two, and 5%, three or more.

CONCLUSIONS

No-scalpel vasectomy, used by nearly one third of U.S. physicians, has become an accepted part of urologic care. Physicians' variations in occlusion methods, use of fascial interposition, and postvasectomy protocols underscore the need for large scale, controlled, and statistically valid studies to determine the efficacy of occlusion methods and fascial interposition, as well as whether azoospermia is the only determination of a successful vasectomy.

摘要

目的

目前,美国尚无监测系统收集每年输精管切除术的数量及相关特征的数据。本研究提供了全国范围内输精管切除术的数量、无手术刀输精管切除术的使用情况、各种闭塞方法、筋膜间置术以及输精管切除术后精液分析方案的数据。

方法

对从美国医学协会医师主档案中抽取的1800家泌尿外科、家庭医学和普通外科诊所进行回顾性邮件调查(并进行电话随访),按专业和人口普查区域分层。邮件调查和电话随访的回复率为88%。

结果

1995年,美国约15800名医生估计共实施了约494000例输精管切除术。泌尿外科医生实施了所有输精管切除术的76%,1995年几乎所有(93%)的泌尿外科诊所都开展了输精管切除术。1995年近三分之一(29%)的输精管切除术为无手术刀输精管切除术,实施无手术刀输精管切除术的医生中有37%是自学该手术的。1995年最常用的闭塞方法(用于所有输精管切除术的38%)是结扎与烧灼同时使用。1995年,在所有接受调查的医生中,略少于一半(48%)的医生在进行输精管切除术时在输精管一端间置了筋膜鞘。确保无精子症的方案各不相同:56%的医生要求输精管切除术后提供一份精液标本;39%要求两份,5%要求三份或更多。

结论

近三分之一的美国医生使用的无手术刀输精管切除术已成为泌尿外科治疗中被认可的一部分。医生在闭塞方法、筋膜间置术的使用以及输精管切除术后方案上的差异突出表明,需要开展大规模、对照且具有统计学效力的研究,以确定闭塞方法和筋膜间置术的疗效,以及无精子症是否是输精管切除术成功的唯一判定标准。

相似文献

1
Clinical aspects of vasectomies performed in the United States in 1995.1995年在美国进行输精管切除术的临床情况。
Urology. 1998 Oct;52(4):685-91. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00274-x.
2
Vasectomy in the United States, 2002.2002年美国的输精管切除术
J Urol. 2006 Jul;176(1):232-6; discussion 236. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00507-6.
3
Vasectomy in the United States, 1991.1991年美国的输精管切除术
Am J Public Health. 1995 May;85(5):644-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.5.644.
4
Vasectomy by ligation and excision, with or without fascial interposition: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN77781689].输精管结扎切除术,伴或不伴筋膜置入:一项随机对照试验[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN77781689]
BMC Med. 2004 Mar 31;2:6. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-6.
5
Expanding the use of no-scalpel vasectomies.扩大无刀输精管切除术的应用范围。
Contracept Technol Update. 1999 Apr;20(4):46-7.
6
Strengthening vasectomy services in Rwanda: introduction of thermal cautery with fascial interposition.加强卢旺达的输精管绝育服务:引入热烧灼与筋膜间置。
Contraception. 2013 Mar;87(3):375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.019. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
7
National Characteristics of Surgeons Performing Vasectomy: Increasing Specialization and a Persistent Gender Gap.输精管切除术外科医生的国家特征:专业化程度不断提高,性别差距持续存在。
Urology. 2020 Sep;143:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
8
Vasal sterilization in China.中国的输精管绝育术。
Contraception. 1993 Sep;48(3):255-65. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90144-v.
9
Increasing the availability of vasectomy in public-sector clinics.增加公共部门诊所输精管切除术的可及性。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1997 Jul-Aug;29(4):185-6, 190.
10
No-scalpel vasectomy outside China.中国境外的非手术刀输精管切除术。
Asian J Androl. 2000 Mar;2(1):21-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to american urological association (AUA) vasectomy guidelines: a systematic review of current practice among healthcare providers.对美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)输精管切除术指南的遵循情况:对医疗服务提供者当前实践的系统评价
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Feb 1. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01023-8.
2
UPDATE - 2022 Canadian Urological Association best practice report: Vasectomy.更新 - 2022年加拿大泌尿外科协会最佳实践报告:输精管切除术
Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 May;16(5):E231-E236. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7860.
3
Development of Novel Male Contraceptives.新型男性避孕药的研制。
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Mar;13(2):228-237. doi: 10.1111/cts.12708. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
4
Vasectomy: tips and tricks.输精管切除术:技巧与窍门。
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Aug;6(4):704-709. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.08.
5
CUA guideline: Vasectomy.加拿大泌尿外科学会指南:输精管切除术
Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 Aug;10(7-8):E274-E278. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4017. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
6
Male contraception.男性避孕
Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1303-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.036. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
7
Prospective comparison of ligation and bipolar cautery technique in non-scalpel vasectomy.非手术刀输精管结扎术中结扎术与双极电凝技术的前瞻性比较。
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Nov-Dec;41(6):1172-7. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0356.
8
Vasectomy update 2010.2010年输精管切除术最新进展
Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Oct;4(5):306-9. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.10123.
9
Vasectomy by epithelial curettage without suture or cautery: a pilot study in humans.经上皮刮除术的免缝合和免烧灼输精管切除术:一项人体初步研究。
Asian J Androl. 2010 May;12(3):315-21. doi: 10.1038/aja.2009.94. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
10
Paternity after vasectomy with two previous semen analyses without spermatozoa.双侧输精管结扎术后两次精液分析无精子情况下的亲权鉴定
Sao Paulo Med J. 2007 Mar 1;125(2):122-3. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802007000200011.