Mahdi Mohammed, Hammad Muhammed A M, Abou Chawareb Elia, Almuhaideb Mana, Yafi Faysal A
University of California, Irvine Department of Urology, Irvine, CA, USA.
Department of Urology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Feb 1. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01023-8.
Vasectomy, a common male sterilization procedure, has seen a surge in popularity following the 2022 reversal of Roe v. Wade. The American Urological Association (AUA) vasectomy guidelines provide essential guidance for providers, outlining best practices for the procedure. We reviewed studies that examined adherence to the AUA vasectomy guidelines with regard to pre-procedure counseling, surgical technique, and post vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) practice, as well as studies evaluating the impact of these guidelines on urology and non-urology practices. A total of five studies were identified that assessed adherence to the guidelines. Only one of these studies evaluated adherence to all three aspects of the guidelines. The remaining four studies focused solely on the practice of PVSA. Overall, urologists exhibited greater adherence to the guidelines compared to other healthcare providers. However, the adherence rates were still suboptimal. Five additional studies were included that evaluated the use of home-based PVSA, which is not part of the AUA guidelines. Conflicting results were found regarding the test compliance. While the studies evaluating home-based PVSA may raise the question of including this approach in the guidelines panel discussion, it is important to consider the potential benefits and drawbacks before incorporating it as an option in future guidelines.
输精管切除术是一种常见的男性绝育手术,自2022年罗诉韦德案被推翻以来,其受欢迎程度激增。美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)的输精管切除术指南为医疗服务提供者提供了重要指导,概述了该手术的最佳实践方法。我们回顾了一些研究,这些研究考察了在术前咨询、手术技术和输精管切除术后精液分析(PVSA)实践方面对AUA输精管切除术指南的遵循情况,以及评估这些指南对泌尿外科和非泌尿外科实践影响的研究。总共确定了五项评估对指南遵循情况的研究。其中只有一项研究评估了对指南所有三个方面的遵循情况。其余四项研究仅关注PVSA的实践。总体而言,与其他医疗服务提供者相比,泌尿外科医生对指南的遵循程度更高。然而,遵循率仍未达到最佳水平。另外纳入了五项评估家庭式PVSA使用情况的研究,家庭式PVSA并非AUA指南的一部分。关于检测依从性,研究结果相互矛盾。虽然评估家庭式PVSA的研究可能会引发在指南小组讨论中纳入这种方法的问题,但在将其作为未来指南的一种选择纳入之前,考虑其潜在的利弊是很重要的。