Trent S C
Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22903, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 1998 Sep-Oct;31(5):503-13. doi: 10.1177/002221949803100508.
Currently, many special education policymakers, researchers, and practitioners are questioning the efficacy of pull-out programs for students with disabilities and advocating service delivery in inclusive or general education settings at both the elementary and the secondary level. I investigated the implementation of a collaborative teaching model in a suburban high school to determine how this move toward inclusive education benefited teachers and students. Through examination of the "ups and downs" of a U.S. History teacher, I concluded that replicating and sustaining collaborative teaching can be difficult and complex and, without careful consideration of contextual variables, may not lead to improved outcomes for either teachers or students. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
目前,许多特殊教育政策制定者、研究人员和从业者都在质疑为残疾学生提供的抽离式教学项目的有效性,并主张在小学和中学阶段的全纳教育或普通教育环境中提供服务。我调查了一所郊区高中合作教学模式的实施情况,以确定这种向全纳教育的转变如何使教师和学生受益。通过审视一位美国历史教师经历的“起起落落”,我得出结论,复制和维持合作教学可能既困难又复杂,而且如果不仔细考虑情境变量,可能不会给教师或学生带来更好的结果。文中还讨论了对研究和实践的启示。