• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拒绝敏感性与儿童的人际困难。

Rejection sensitivity and children's interpersonal difficulties.

作者信息

Downey G, Lebolt A, Rincón C, Freitas A L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

出版信息

Child Dev. 1998 Aug;69(4):1074-91.

PMID:9768487
Abstract

Some children respond to social rejection in ways that undermine their relationships, whereas others respond with more equanimity. This article reports 3 studies that test the proposition that rejection sensitivity--the disposition to defensively (i.e., anxiously or angrily) expect, readily perceive, and overreact to social rejection--helps explain individual differences in response to social rejection. Data were from urban, minority (primarily Hispanic and African American) fifth to seventh graders. Study 1 describes the development of a measure of rejection sensitivity for children. Study 2 provides experimental evidence that children who angrily expected rejection showed heightened distress following an ambiguously intentioned rejection by a peer. Study 3 shows that rejection sensitive children behaved more aggressively and experienced increased interpersonal difficulties and declines in academic functioning over time.

摘要

一些孩子对社交排斥的反应方式会破坏他们的人际关系,而另一些孩子的反应则更为平静。本文报告了3项研究,这些研究检验了以下观点:拒绝敏感性——即防御性地(即焦虑或愤怒地)预期、容易察觉到并对社交排斥过度反应的倾向——有助于解释个体在应对社交排斥时的差异。数据来自城市中的少数族裔(主要是西班牙裔和非裔美国人)五至七年级学生。研究1描述了一种针对儿童的拒绝敏感性测量方法的开发。研究2提供了实验证据,表明那些愤怒地预期会被拒绝的孩子在被同伴模棱两可地拒绝后会表现出更高的痛苦程度。研究3表明,随着时间的推移,对拒绝敏感的孩子行为更具攻击性,人际困难增加,学业成绩下降。

相似文献

1
Rejection sensitivity and children's interpersonal difficulties.拒绝敏感性与儿童的人际困难。
Child Dev. 1998 Aug;69(4):1074-91.
2
Rejection sensitivity and the rejection-hostility link in romantic relationships.恋爱关系中的拒绝敏感性与拒绝敌意关联。
J Pers. 2010 Feb;78(1):119-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00611.x.
3
Interpersonal rejection sensitivity in childhood sexual abuse survivors: mediator of depressive symptoms and anger suppression.童年期性虐待幸存者的人际拒绝敏感性:抑郁症状和愤怒抑制的中介因素
J Interpers Violence. 2004 Jan;19(1):90-107. doi: 10.1177/0886260503259052.
4
Prospective relations among victimization, rejection, friendlessness, and children's self- and peer-perceptions.受害、被拒、孤独与儿童的自我认知及同伴认知之间的前瞻性关系。
Child Dev. 2005 Nov-Dec;76(6):1161-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00842.x.
5
The clinical significance and assessment of poor peer relations: peer neglect versus peer rejection.同伴关系不良的临床意义及评估:同伴忽视与同伴排斥
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1987 Aug;8(4):233-40.
6
Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships.拒绝敏感性对亲密关系的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Jun;70(6):1327-43. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.6.1327.
7
Relations between different types of children's aggressive behavior and sociometric status among peers of the same and opposite gender.不同类型儿童攻击性行为与同性及异性同伴间社会测量地位的关系。
Scand J Psychol. 2006 Dec;47(6):477-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00541.x.
8
Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment.青春期前的友谊和同伴排斥作为成人适应能力的预测因素。
Child Dev. 1998 Feb;69(1):140-53.
9
Assessment of peer neglect in the preschool years: a short-term longitudinal study.学龄前同伴忽视的评估:一项短期纵向研究。
J Clin Child Psychol. 1997 Dec;26(4):424-32. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2604_11.
10
The effects of rejection sensitivity on reactive and proactive aggression.拒绝敏感性对反应性攻击和主动性攻击的影响。
Aggress Behav. 2013 Jan;39(1):3-12. doi: 10.1002/ab.21455. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Social rejection sensitivity and its role in anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of experimental literature.社交拒绝敏感性及其在神经性厌食症中的作用:实验文献的系统综述
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jul 10;13(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01261-7.
2
Mapping the Influence of Infant-Parent Relational Quality on Life Course Relationships: A Scoping Review of Prospective Cohort Studies.探究婴儿-父母关系质量对人生历程中人际关系的影响:前瞻性队列研究的范围综述
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2025 Jun 8. doi: 10.1007/s10567-025-00527-5.
3
Parenting behaviors and deviant peer affiliation among Chinese adolescents: the mediating role of psychological reactance and the moderating role of gender.
中国青少年的养育行为与不良同伴关系:心理抗拒的中介作用及性别的调节作用
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 14;13(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02703-2.
4
The Effect of Cyber-Ostracism on Social Anxiety Among Undergraduates: The Mediating Effects of Rejection Sensitivity and Rumination.网络排斥对大学生社交焦虑的影响:拒绝敏感性和沉思的中介作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 1;15(1):37. doi: 10.3390/bs15010037.
5
How Is Rejection Sensitivity Linked to Non-Suicidal Self-Injury? Exploring Social Anxiety and Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy as Explanatory Processes in a Longitudinal Study of Chinese Adolescents.拒绝敏感性如何与非自杀性自伤相关联?在中国青少年的一项纵向研究中,探索社交焦虑和调节情绪自我效能感作为解释过程。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;14(10):943. doi: 10.3390/bs14100943.
6
Transitions in Suicide Risk from Early Adolescence to Early Adulthood.从青春期早期到成年早期自杀风险的转变
Arch Suicide Res. 2024 Sep 27:1-17. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2403491.
7
Efficacy of a transdiagnostic Internet prevention approach in adolescents (EMPATIA study): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.一种跨诊断的互联网预防方法对青少年的疗效(EMPATIA 研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Aug 8;25(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08241-3.
8
Behavioral and neural responses to social exclusion in women: the role of facial attractiveness and friendliness.女性遭受社会排斥时的行为和神经反应:面部吸引力和友善程度的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65833-4.
9
It takes two: examining the dynamic nature of cooperative behavior in adolescents.这需要两方共同参与:探究青少年合作行为的动态本质。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 29;15:1269016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1269016. eCollection 2024.
10
Mitigating the affective and cognitive consequences of social exclusion: an integrative data analysis of seven social disconnection interventions.减轻社会排斥的情感和认知后果:对七种社会隔离干预措施的综合数据分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 7;24(1):1250. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18365-5.