Hudgel D W, Gordon E A, Thanakitcharu S, Bruce E N
Case Western Reserve University MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Oct;158(4):1142-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9712105.
Because of the oscillatory pattern of upper airway resistance and breathing during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), we hypothesized that OSA patients have an underlying instability of ventilatory drive to inspiratory muscles. To assess the stability of ventilatory drive in OSA patients and controls, we used the pseudorandom binary stimulation (PRBS) test and examined the closed- and open-loop responses to hyperoxic hypercapnia. The closed-loop response is produced by interactions of dynamic gain in controller, plant, and ventilatory feedback. The open-loop response reflects controller dynamic gain or frequency-dependent chemosensitivity. As compared with 16 nonapneic, nonobese control subjects, a group of nine obese OSA patients had a higher peak response and a more rapid and irregular recovery phase of the closed-loop CO2 response in the PRBS test. The two groups had similar open-loop responses in the PRBS test, suggesting that central dynamic CO2 chemosensitivity was not abnormal in OSA. We conclude that the differences between OSA patients and controls in the closed-loop response in the PRBS test are not due to differences in dynamic controller gain, but are related to differences in dynamic plant gain and/or negative ventilatory feedback. In addition to OSA, obesity may affect these variables and may have been responsible for our findings.
由于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者睡眠期间上呼吸道阻力和呼吸的振荡模式,我们推测OSA患者对吸气肌的通气驱动存在潜在的不稳定性。为了评估OSA患者和对照组通气驱动的稳定性,我们采用伪随机二元刺激(PRBS)试验,并检测了对高氧高碳酸血症的闭环和开环反应。闭环反应由控制器、被控对象和通气反馈中的动态增益相互作用产生。开环反应反映了控制器动态增益或频率依赖性化学敏感性。与16名无呼吸暂停、非肥胖的对照受试者相比,一组9名肥胖OSA患者在PRBS试验中闭环二氧化碳反应的峰值反应更高,恢复阶段更快且不规则。两组在PRBS试验中的开环反应相似,表明OSA患者的中枢动态二氧化碳化学敏感性无异常。我们得出结论,PRBS试验中OSA患者与对照组在闭环反应上的差异并非由于动态控制器增益的差异,而是与动态被控对象增益和/或负通气反馈的差异有关。除了OSA外,肥胖可能会影响这些变量,可能是我们研究结果的原因。