Daniels N, Sabin J
Harvard Medical School, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Sep-Oct;17(5):50-64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.5.50.
Two notions of accountability embodied in proposals to reform managed care have different ethical implications. Market accountability requires plans to inform purchasers and consumers about performance and options, in theory legitimizing limits to care through consumer choice. Recognizing the limits of consumer choice, accountability for reasonableness requires that the rationales for limits to services be public and be based on reasons or rules that "fair-minded" people can agree are relevant to pursuing appropriate patient care under necessary resource constraints. Accountability for reasonableness educates clinicians and patients about the need for limits and empowers a more focused public deliberation in which ultimate authority for limiting care rests with democratic processes.
管理式医疗改革提案中体现的两种问责观念具有不同的伦理含义。市场问责要求计划向购买者和消费者通报绩效和选择,理论上通过消费者选择使医疗限制合法化。认识到消费者选择的局限性,合理性问责要求服务限制的理由公开,并基于 “公正” 的人能够认同的、与在必要资源限制下追求适当的患者护理相关的理由或规则。合理性问责向临床医生和患者宣传限制的必要性,并授权进行更有针对性的公众审议,其中限制医疗的最终权力在于民主程序。