Suppr超能文献

管理式医疗改革中的问责伦理。

The ethics of accountability in managed care reform.

作者信息

Daniels N, Sabin J

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Sep-Oct;17(5):50-64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.5.50.

Abstract

Two notions of accountability embodied in proposals to reform managed care have different ethical implications. Market accountability requires plans to inform purchasers and consumers about performance and options, in theory legitimizing limits to care through consumer choice. Recognizing the limits of consumer choice, accountability for reasonableness requires that the rationales for limits to services be public and be based on reasons or rules that "fair-minded" people can agree are relevant to pursuing appropriate patient care under necessary resource constraints. Accountability for reasonableness educates clinicians and patients about the need for limits and empowers a more focused public deliberation in which ultimate authority for limiting care rests with democratic processes.

摘要

管理式医疗改革提案中体现的两种问责观念具有不同的伦理含义。市场问责要求计划向购买者和消费者通报绩效和选择,理论上通过消费者选择使医疗限制合法化。认识到消费者选择的局限性,合理性问责要求服务限制的理由公开,并基于 “公正” 的人能够认同的、与在必要资源限制下追求适当的患者护理相关的理由或规则。合理性问责向临床医生和患者宣传限制的必要性,并授权进行更有针对性的公众审议,其中限制医疗的最终权力在于民主程序。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验