Piazza C C, Hanley G P, Fisher W W, Ruyter J M, Gulotta C S
Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Res Dev Disabil. 1998 Sep-Oct;19(5):395-407. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(98)00013-4.
The results of functional analyses suggested that the destructive behavior of two individuals was sensitive to escape and attention as reinforcement. In an instructional context, we evaluated the effects of reinforcing compliance with functional reinforcers when destructive behavior produced a break. For one participant we also evaluated the effects of reinforcing compliance with functional reinforcers when destructive behavior produced no differential consequence (escape extinction). We hypothesized that destructive behavior failed to decrease in an instructional context when compliance resulted in a break because presentation of a break evoked attention-maintained destructive behavior. The results of a reinforcer assessment supported this hypothesis by demonstrating that demands functioned as positive reinforcement when no alternative activities were available. These results are discussed in terms of the importance of establishing operations in determining the appetitive or aversive properties of stimuli when destructive behavior is multiply controlled.
功能分析结果表明,两名个体的破坏性行为对作为强化物的逃避和注意敏感。在教学情境中,我们评估了破坏性行为导致休息时强化对功能性强化物的依从性的效果。对于一名参与者,我们还评估了破坏性行为未产生差异结果(逃避消退)时强化对功能性强化物的依从性的效果。我们假设,当依从导致休息时,破坏性行为在教学情境中未能减少,因为休息的呈现引发了注意维持的破坏性行为。强化物评估结果支持了这一假设,即当没有其他替代活动时,要求起到了正强化的作用。当破坏性行为受到多种控制时,本文根据建立操作在确定刺激的偏好或厌恶属性方面的重要性对这些结果进行了讨论。