Purvis N, Stelzer G
Cytometry Associates, Inc., Brentwood, Tennessee 37027, USA.
Cytometry. 1998 Oct 1;33(2):156-65.
As flow cytometry laboratories involve themselves in more multi-site domestic and international clinical trial and research studies, it becomes imperative that they develop and adopt qualitative and quantitative standardization. This standardization does not need to be at the instrument-design level but it may evolve from a general consensus on instrument setup, internationally accepted standardized procedures, and quantitative fluorescence intensity units. Instrument condition, age, and setup as well as model and manufacturer all affect the overall instrument performance and quantitative characteristics. Therefore, when working with multiple instruments, platforms, or sites, a standard window of analysis is essential. Furthermore, we should strive to characterize instrument performance and quantitative indices so that data can be compared directly. The same thoughts and ideals hold true for standardizing procedures and reagents. Clones, conjugation, incubation times, pH, temperature, and other environmental conditions all combine to affect the qualitative and quantitative cellular indices that we are attempting to measure. Data are presented that illustrates why standardization is needed and how we have attempted to achieve it in our laboratories.
随着流式细胞术实验室越来越多地参与国内外多中心临床试验和研究,制定并采用定性和定量标准化变得势在必行。这种标准化无需在仪器设计层面进行,但可源自对仪器设置的普遍共识、国际认可的标准化程序以及定量荧光强度单位。仪器状况、使用年限、设置以及型号和制造商都会影响仪器的整体性能和定量特性。因此,在使用多台仪器、平台或多个场所时,分析的标准窗口至关重要。此外,我们应努力描述仪器性能和定量指标,以便能够直接比较数据。对于程序和试剂的标准化,同样的思路和理念也适用。克隆、偶联、孵育时间、pH值、温度以及其他环境条件都会共同影响我们试图测量的细胞定性和定量指标。本文展示的数据说明了为何需要标准化以及我们在实验室中是如何尝试实现标准化的。