• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两项美国空军飞行员能力倾向测试的比较。

A comparison of two U.S. Air Force pilot aptitude tests.

作者信息

Carretta T R, Retzlaff P D, Callister J D, King R E

机构信息

Air Force Research Laboratory, Brooks Air Force Base, TX 78235-5352, USA.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998 Oct;69(10):931-5.

PMID:9773892
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Air Force Officer Qualifying Test (AFOQT) and Multidimensional Aptitude Battery (MAB) were administered to 2233 U.S. Air Force pilot candidates to investigate the common sources of variance in those batteries. The AFOQT was operationally administered as part of the officer commissioning and aircrew selection testing requirement. The MAB is a clinical test battery and was administered to provide an intellectual baseline to assist clinicians when it becomes necessary to evaluate pilots with cognitive referral questions.

RESULTS

A joint factor analysis of the AFOQT and MAB revealed that each battery had a hierarchical structure. The higher-order factor in the AFOQT previously had been identified as general cognitive ability (g). The intercorrelation between the higher-order factors from the batteries was 0.981, indicating that both measured g. Although both batteries measured g and included verbal, spatial, and perceptual speed tests, the AFOQT also included tests of aviation knowledge not found in the MAB.

CONCLUSION

Additional studies are required to evaluate the utility of the AFOQT for clinical assessment and the MAB for officer and aircrew selection.

摘要

背景

对2233名美国空军飞行员候选人进行了空军军官资格测试(AFOQT)和多维能力测验(MAB),以调查这些测验中共同的方差来源。AFOQT作为军官授衔和机组人员选拔测试要求的一部分进行实际施测。MAB是一种临床测验组合,施测该测验是为了在有必要对存在认知转介问题的飞行员进行评估时提供智力基线,以协助临床医生。

结果

对AFOQT和MAB进行的联合因素分析表明,每个测验组合都具有层次结构。AFOQT中的高阶因素先前已被确定为一般认知能力(g)。两个测验组合的高阶因素之间的相互关联为0.981,表明两者都测量了g。虽然两个测验组合都测量了g,且都包括语言、空间和知觉速度测试,但AFOQT还包括MAB中未有的航空知识测试。

结论

需要进行更多研究来评估AFOQT在临床评估中的效用以及MAB在军官和机组人员选拔中的效用。

相似文献

1
A comparison of two U.S. Air Force pilot aptitude tests.两项美国空军飞行员能力倾向测试的比较。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998 Oct;69(10):931-5.
2
Male-female performance on U.S. Air Force pilot selection tests.美国空军飞行员选拔测试中的男女表现。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997 Sep;68(9):818-23.
3
U.S. Air Force pilot selection tests: what is measured and what is predictive?美国空军飞行员选拔测试:测试内容及预测指标是什么?
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996 Mar;67(3):279-83.
4
Determinants of enlisted air traffic controller success.现役空中交通管制员成功的决定因素。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Sep;70(9):910-8.
5
The estimated full-scale intellectual abilities of U.S. Army aviators.美国陆军飞行员的估计全量表智力能力。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 May;78(5 Suppl):B261-7.
6
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
7
Aircrew selection systems.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1988 Nov;59(11 Pt 2):A32-8.
8
Defining and measuring the "right stuff": neuropsychiatrically enhanced flight screening (N-EFS).定义和衡量“正确特质”:神经精神增强型飞行筛查(N-EFS)。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1995 Oct;66(10):951-6.
9
Factor Structure and Criterion-Related Validity of the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test Form T for Pilot Applicants.空军军官资格测试表 T 用于飞行员申请人的因素结构和效标关联效度。
Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):508-532. doi: 10.1177/10731911211058691. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
10
Objective psychological testing of U.S. Air Force officers in pilot training.对美国空军飞行员培训学员进行客观心理测试。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1988 Jul;59(7):661-3.