Porter R S, Zhao N
Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Oct;32(4):418-24. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70169-6.
Investigators have described a "seat belt syndrome" consisting variously of injuries to the lumbar or cervical spine, abdominal contents, or all 3. In this study we sought to identify these and any other patterns of injury associated with seat belt use in patients who presented to a trauma center after a motor vehicle crash.
The charts of all patients involved in motor vehicle crashes who presented as trauma alerts to the study institution between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 1993, were retrospectively reviewed for data regarding belt use and 35 specific injuries in 7 body regions. We calculated the positive likelihood ratio of injury between belted and unbelted patients, along with 95% confidence intervals.
We identified 1,124 patients involved in motor vehicle crashes. Of these subjects, 376 were belted and 544 unbelted; in 204 belt status was unknown. Belted patients were more likely to have sustained sternal fracture than were unbelted patients (4% versus .7%; positive likelihood ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 3.29) but were less likely to have sustained head injury (30.6% versus 46.0%; positive likelihood ratio, .67; 95% confidence interval, .53 to .83). We noted no statistically significant differences in the rates of other specific injuries, including cervical and lumbar fractures and the need for abdominal surgery.
Severe injuries of all types occur in both belted and unbelted individuals involved in motor vehicle crashes who present to a typical trauma center. With the exception of sternal fractures, injuries previously associated with the seat belt syndrome occurred in similar proportions of belted and unbelted patients. Head injuries were less frequent. Seat belt use cannot serve as a discriminator for specific injury. A diligent search of all body regions is indicated in both belted and unbelted patients.
研究人员描述了一种“安全带综合征”,包括腰椎或颈椎损伤、腹部脏器损伤或三者皆有。在本研究中,我们试图确定在机动车碰撞事故后前往创伤中心就诊的患者中,与使用安全带相关的这些损伤模式以及其他任何损伤模式。
回顾性分析1991年1月1日至1993年12月31日期间作为创伤警报被送至研究机构的所有机动车碰撞事故患者的病历,以获取有关安全带使用情况以及7个身体部位35种特定损伤的数据。我们计算了系安全带和未系安全带患者损伤的阳性似然比以及95%置信区间。
我们确定了1124例机动车碰撞事故患者。其中,376例系了安全带,544例未系安全带;204例安全带使用情况未知。系安全带的患者比未系安全带的患者更易发生胸骨骨折(4%对0.7%;阳性似然比为1.97;95%置信区间为1.09至3.29),但发生头部损伤的可能性较小(30.6%对46.0%;阳性似然比为0.67;95%置信区间为0.53至0.83)。我们注意到其他特定损伤的发生率,包括颈椎和腰椎骨折以及腹部手术需求,在统计学上无显著差异。
在前往典型创伤中心就诊的机动车碰撞事故中,系安全带和未系安全带的个体都会发生各种严重损伤。除胸骨骨折外,先前与安全带综合征相关的损伤在系安全带和未系安全带的患者中发生率相似。头部损伤较少见。安全带的使用不能作为特定损伤的鉴别指标。对于系安全带和未系安全带的患者,都需要仔细检查身体的所有部位。