Li F, Harmer P, Duncan T E, Duncan S C, Acock A, Yamamoto T
Oregon Research Institute, USA.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998 Sep;69(3):276-83. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1998.10607694.
Although a number of factor analytic studies have been conducted on the factorial validity of the Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ), the results have been equivocal. To further substantiate its evidence of validity, this study cross-validated the measurement model using a rigorous structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. Data collected from a college student sample were first analyzed on a calibration sample (n = 439). Results confirmed the two-factor orthogonal structure representing the underlying task and ego orientations. The results were cross-validated on a validation sample (n = 439) using various SEM-based cross-validation procedures. Collectively, these findings support the construct validity of the TEOSQ as a measure of achievement goal orientation.
尽管已经对体育问卷中的任务和自我定向（TEOSQ）的因素效度进行了多项因素分析研究，但其结果并不明确。为了进一步证实其效度证据，本研究采用严格的结构方程建模（SEM）方法对测量模型进行了交叉验证。首先在一个校准样本（n = 439）上分析了从大学生样本中收集的数据。结果证实了代表潜在任务和自我定向的双因素正交结构。使用各种基于SEM的交叉验证程序在一个验证样本（n = 439）上对结果进行了交叉验证。总体而言，这些发现支持了TEOSQ作为成就目标定向测量工具的结构效度。
