Lee C D, Jackson A S, Blair S N
Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998 Aug;22 Suppl 2:S2-7.
The health consequences of weight ranges across low to moderate and high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are unknown.
To evaluate the validity of the 1995 US weight guidelines, while considering cardiorespiratory fitness.
We followed 21,856 men, aged 30-83 y, who had a complete preventive medical examination, including a maximal treadmill exercise test and body composition assessment. There were 427 deaths (144 cardiovascular disease (CVD); 143 cancer; 140 others) during an average of 8.1 y of follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine the relations among cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), and all-cause and CVD mortality.
After adjustment for age, examination year, cigarette smoking and alcohol intake, we observed that men with a BMI of 19.0 to < 25.0 and who were unfit had 2.3 times the risk of all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.59-3.17, P < 0.001) compared with fit men in this BMI group (reference category). Unfit men with a BMI of 25.0 to < 27.8 also had a greater risk of all-cause mortality than fit men in the same BMI category. Fit but overweight men (BMI > or = 27.8) had a similar rate of all-cause mortality as physically fit men of normal weight (BMI 19.0 to < 25.0) and had a lower risk of all-cause mortality than unfit and normal weight men. Fit men of normal weight had the lowest CVD mortality, while unfit and overweight men experienced the highest CVD mortality. Unfit men had substantially higher CVD mortality than fit men in each BMI group.
Unfit men had higher all-cause and CVD mortality than fit men. The health benefits of normal weights appear to be limited to men who have moderate or high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness. These data suggest that the 1995 US weight guidelines may be misleading unless cardiorespiratory fitness is taken into account.
低至中等水平以及高水平心肺适能下不同体重范围对健康的影响尚不清楚。
在考虑心肺适能的情况下,评估1995年美国体重指南的有效性。
我们对21856名年龄在30 - 83岁的男性进行了随访,这些男性接受了全面的预防性医学检查,包括最大运动平板试验和身体成分评估。在平均8.1年的随访期间,有427人死亡(144人死于心血管疾病(CVD);143人死于癌症;140人死于其他原因)。我们使用Cox比例风险回归来研究心肺适能、体重指数(BMI,kg/m²)与全因死亡率和CVD死亡率之间的关系。
在对年龄、检查年份、吸烟和饮酒情况进行调整后,我们观察到,BMI为19.0至<25.0且不适能的男性全因死亡风险是该BMI组适能男性(参照类别)的2.3倍(95%置信区间(95%CI),1.59 - 3.17,P<0.001)。BMI为25.0至<27.8且不适能的男性全因死亡风险也高于同一BMI类别的适能男性。适能但超重的男性(BMI≥27.8)全因死亡率与体重正常的适能男性(BMI 19.0至<25.0)相似,且全因死亡风险低于不适能且体重正常的男性。体重正常的适能男性CVD死亡率最低,而不适能且超重的男性CVD死亡率最高。在每个BMI组中,不适能男性的CVD死亡率均显著高于适能男性。
不适能男性的全因死亡率和CVD死亡率高于适能男性。正常体重对健康的益处似乎仅限于心肺适能处于中等或高水平的男性。这些数据表明,1995年美国体重指南可能具有误导性,除非考虑心肺适能。