Suppr超能文献

注意缺陷多动障碍潜在缺陷的神经心理学检查:额叶与右顶叶理论

A neuropsychological examination of the underlying deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: frontal lobe versus right parietal lobe theories.

作者信息

Aman Christine J, Roberts Ralph J, Pennington Bruce F

机构信息

U Denver.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 1998 Sep;34(5):956-969. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.956.

Abstract

A neuropsychological approach was used to examine the frontal lobe and right parietal lobe theories of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Considerable attempts were made to select as pure a group of ADHD boys as possible. The performance of 10-14-year-old ADHD boys (n = 22), both on and off stimulant medication, was compared with the performance of non-ADHD control boys (n = 22) on tasks purported to assess frontal lobe functioning (Stopping Task, Antisaccade Task, Tower of Hanoi) and right parietal lobe functioning (Visual-Spatial Cuing Task, Turning Task, Spatial Relations). Three important findings emerged: (a) unmedicated ADHD boys exhibited performance deficits on tasks in both frontal and parietal domains compared with control boys, (b) unmedicated ADHD boys appeared to be more severely impaired on the frontal tasks than on the parietal tasks, and (c) medicated ADHD boys performed better in both task domains compared with unmedicated ADHD boys. Several alternative interpretations of the results are discussed.

摘要

采用神经心理学方法来检验注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的额叶和右顶叶理论。研究人员做出了相当大的努力,以尽可能挑选出一组纯粹的ADHD男孩。将10至14岁服用和未服用兴奋剂药物的ADHD男孩(n = 22)的表现,与非ADHD对照男孩(n = 22)在旨在评估额叶功能(停止任务、反扫视任务、河内塔)和右顶叶功能(视觉空间线索任务、转向任务、空间关系)的任务上的表现进行了比较。出现了三个重要发现:(a)与对照男孩相比,未服用药物的ADHD男孩在额叶和顶叶领域的任务中均表现出缺陷;(b)未服用药物的ADHD男孩在额叶任务上似乎比在顶叶任务上受损更严重;(c)与未服用药物的ADHD男孩相比,服用药物的ADHD男孩在两个任务领域的表现都更好。文中讨论了对结果的几种不同解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验