Muñoz M, Vázquez C, Koegel P, Sanz J, Burnam M A
Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;33(10):514-20. doi: 10.1007/s001270050088.
In this paper we compare rates of mental disorders (major depression, dysthymia, cognitive impairment, and schizophrenia) among homeless people in Madrid and Los Angeles (LA) and examine the ordering of the onset of both conditions (i.e., homelessness and mental disorders). In the Madrid study, 262 homeless persons were interviewed using the CIDI. In the LA study, 1563 homeless persons were interviewed with the DIS. To make an item-by-item comparison, we companied the databases from both studies to submit a single database to statistical analyses. Results showed no significant differences in DSM-III-R life-time prevalence rates of mental disorders between both samples. However, the Madrid sample showed higher 12-month prevalence rates of dysthymia and cognitive impairment as compared to the LA sample. Most subjects across both cities first experienced symptoms of their mental disorders before first becoming homeless. The only significant difference was that all of the depressed adults in Madrid experienced depression prior to first becoming homeless, whereas this was the case for only 59.1% of LA depressed homeless people. We discuss the reasons for these cultural differences and their implications for cross-national public health research and intervention.
在本文中,我们比较了马德里和洛杉矶无家可归者中精神障碍(重度抑郁症、心境恶劣障碍、认知障碍和精神分裂症)的发病率,并研究了两种情况(即无家可归和精神障碍)发病的先后顺序。在马德里的研究中,使用复合性国际诊断交谈检查表(CIDI)对262名无家可归者进行了访谈。在洛杉矶的研究中,使用诊断访谈表(DIS)对1563名无家可归者进行了访谈。为了进行逐项比较,我们合并了两项研究的数据库,以提交单个数据库进行统计分析。结果显示,两个样本中精神障碍的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)终生患病率没有显著差异。然而,与洛杉矶样本相比,马德里样本中恶劣心境障碍和认知障碍的12个月患病率更高。两个城市的大多数受试者在首次无家可归之前就首先出现了精神障碍症状。唯一的显著差异是,马德里所有抑郁成年人在首次无家可归之前就经历了抑郁,而在洛杉矶抑郁的无家可归者中,只有59.1%的人是这种情况。我们讨论了这些文化差异的原因及其对跨国公共卫生研究和干预的影响。