• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响密歇根州女性使用助产士服务的经济和个人因素。

Economic and personal factors affecting women's use of nurse-midwives in Michigan.

作者信息

Stewart S D

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Bowling Green State University, OH, USA.

出版信息

Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Sep-Oct;30(5):231-5.

PMID:9782046
Abstract

CONTEXT

The proportion of American women who use a nurse-midwife rather than an obstetrician to deliver their baby is increasing. Relatively little is known, however, about the determinants of a midwife-assisted birth.

METHODS

Logistic regression analyses using birth-certificate data on 149,437 Michigan births in 1990 examined the characteristics associated with midwife-attended births.

RESULTS

Women who paid for childbirth with Medicaid were 3.5 times more likely than those paying with private insurance to use a certified nurse-midwife, net of controls for maternal characteristics; this effect varied significantly by race, with Medicaid payment increasing the odds of midwife use threefold among whites and nearly fivefold among nonwhites. The effect of education on midwife use also varied by race: A college education significantly increased the likelihood of midwife use among white women (odds ratio of 2.1), but higher education decreased that probability among nonwhite women (odds ratio of 0.74). Father's education and age, were also significantly associated with the likelihood of a midwife-attended birth; the babies of college-educated fathers had higher odds of being delivered by a nurse-midwife, as did the babies of men in their 30s.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between socioeconomic status and the use of midwives may not be as straightforward as previously thought. The patients of nurse-midwives are a diverse group whose socioeconomic characteristics and probable reasons for choosing a midwife over a physician vary widely.

摘要

背景

在美国,选择由助产士而非产科医生接生的女性比例正在上升。然而,对于助产士辅助分娩的决定因素,人们了解得相对较少。

方法

利用1990年密歇根州149,437例出生证明数据进行逻辑回归分析,研究与助产士接生相关的特征。

结果

在控制了产妇特征后,使用医疗补助计划支付分娩费用的女性选择认证助产士的可能性是使用私人保险支付费用的女性的3.5倍;这种影响因种族而异,医疗补助计划支付费用使白人选择助产士的几率增加了三倍,非白人则增加了近五倍。教育程度对选择助产士的影响也因种族而异:大学教育显著增加了白人女性选择助产士的可能性(优势比为2.1),但高等教育降低了非白人女性选择助产士的可能性(优势比为0.74)。父亲的教育程度和年龄也与助产士接生的可能性显著相关;父亲受过大学教育的婴儿由助产士接生的几率更高,30多岁男性的婴儿也是如此。

结论

社会经济地位与助产士使用之间的关系可能不像以前认为的那么简单。助产士的患者群体多样,其社会经济特征以及选择助产士而非医生的可能原因差异很大。

相似文献

1
Economic and personal factors affecting women's use of nurse-midwives in Michigan.影响密歇根州女性使用助产士服务的经济和个人因素。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Sep-Oct;30(5):231-5.
2
Trends and characteristics of births attended by midwives.助产士接生的分娩趋势及特征。
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1997 Jan-Mar;78(1):9-18.
3
Infant outcomes of certified nurse midwife attended home births: United States 2000 to 2004.认证护士助产士接生的家庭分娩的婴儿结局:美国,2000 年至 2004 年。
J Perinatol. 2010 Sep;30(9):622-7. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.12. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
4
Midwife-attended births in the United States, 1990-2012: results from revised birth certificate data.1990 - 2012年美国助产士接生情况:出生证明数据修订结果
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):10-5. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12287.
5
Maternal factors and the probability of a planned home birth.母亲因素与计划在家分娩的可能性
BJOG. 2005 Jun;112(6):748-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00520.x.
6
Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.美国计划在家分娩的围产期风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):350.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
7
Trends in midwife-attended births in the United States, 1989-2009.美国 1989-2009 年助产士接生的趋势。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;57(4):321-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00198.x. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
8
Live births resulting from unintended pregnancies: is there variation among states? The PRAMS Working Group.意外怀孕导致的活产:各州之间存在差异吗?PRAMS 工作组。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 May-Jun;31(3):132-6.
9
Maternal birthplace and breastfeeding initiation among term and preterm infants: a statewide assessment for Massachusetts.足月和早产婴儿的母亲出生地与母乳喂养起始情况:马萨诸塞州的一项全州范围评估
Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):e1048-54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2637.
10
Certified nurse midwife-attended births: trends in Washington State, 1995-2004.由认证助产士接生的分娩情况:华盛顿州1995 - 2004年的趋势
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;52(5):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.03.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's experience of agency and respect in maternity care by type of insurance in California.加州不同保险类型下的产妇护理中女性的代理体验和尊重感。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 27;15(7):e0235262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235262. eCollection 2020.
2
Characteristics of patients receiving midwife-led prenatal care in Canada: results from the Maternity Experiences Survey (MES).加拿大接受助产士主导的产前护理的患者特征:来自产妇经历调查(MES)的结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1350-4.