Suppr超能文献

Futuro手腕矫形器与合成ThermoLyn矫形器的比较:实用性和临床效果。

A comparison of the Futuro wrist orthosis with a synthetic ThermoLyn orthosis: utility and clinical effectiveness.

作者信息

Tijhuis G J, Vliet Vlieland T P, Zwinderman A H, Hazes J M

机构信息

Leiden University Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res. 1998 Jun;11(3):217-22. doi: 10.1002/art.1790110309.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term utility and clinical effectiveness of the commercial-made Futuro wrist orthosis with a newly developed, custom-made ThermoLyn wrist orthosis.

METHODS

Using a randomized cross-over trial, 10 patients with rheumatoid arthritis used each of the two orthoses for two weeks. Outcome measures were patients' judgments with respect to different statements about utility and clinical assessments including pain and swelling of the wrist and finger joints, range of motion of the wrist, and grip strength. At the end of the study the patients were asked which of the two orthoses they preferred and why.

RESULTS

Patients tended to favor the Futuro wrist orthosis with respect to pain relief and to handling the orthosis. The visual analog scale score of the appearance of the ThermoLyn wrist orthosis was a little higher than that of the Futuro wrist orthosis, but the difference was not statistically significant. Clinical parameters such as pain in the wrist, swelling of the wrist and finger joints, and movements of the wrist showed that the Futuro orthosis tended to be more effective than the ThermoLyn orthosis. None of the differences reached statistical significance. At the end of the study, 5 patients preferred the Futuro and 5 patients the ThermoLyn wrist orthosis. Arguments in favor of the ThermoLyn orthosis were better hygiene, stability, and no need to remove the orthosis during dirty and wet conditions. Arguments in favor of the Futuro orthosis were greater suppleness and freedom of movement.

CONCLUSIONS

The ready-made fabric Futuro wrist orthosis appears to be as good as the more expensive individually made synthetic ThermoLyn wrist orthosis with respect to short-term utility and clinical effectiveness. The conditions under which the orthosis will be worn will help to decide which orthosis is the best for the patient. In the event that the patient wants to use the orthosis in wet and dirty conditions, the ThermoLyn wrist orthosis is a good alternative to the Futuro wrist orthosis.

摘要

目的

比较市售的Futuro手腕矫形器与新开发的定制ThermoLyn手腕矫形器的短期效用和临床效果。

方法

采用随机交叉试验,10名类风湿性关节炎患者分别使用这两种矫形器两周。结果指标包括患者对关于效用的不同陈述的判断以及临床评估,如手腕和手指关节的疼痛与肿胀、手腕活动范围和握力。在研究结束时,询问患者他们更喜欢这两种矫形器中的哪一种以及原因。

结果

在缓解疼痛和佩戴矫形器方面,患者倾向于选择Futuro手腕矫形器。ThermoLyn手腕矫形器外观的视觉模拟量表评分略高于Futuro手腕矫形器,但差异无统计学意义。手腕疼痛、手腕和手指关节肿胀以及手腕活动等临床参数表明,Futuro矫形器往往比ThermoLyn矫形器更有效。所有差异均未达到统计学意义。在研究结束时,5名患者更喜欢Futuro,5名患者更喜欢ThermoLyn手腕矫形器。支持ThermoLyn矫形器的理由是卫生状况更好、稳定性好以及在脏污和潮湿条件下无需摘下矫形器。支持Futuro矫形器的理由是柔韧性更好和活动自由度更高。

结论

就短期效用和临床效果而言,现成的织物Futuro手腕矫形器似乎与更昂贵的定制合成ThermoLyn手腕矫形器一样好。佩戴矫形器的条件将有助于决定哪种矫形器最适合患者。如果患者想在潮湿和脏污的条件下使用矫形器,ThermoLyn手腕矫形器是Futuro手腕矫形器的一个不错的替代品。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验