Loewe R, Schwartzman J, Freeman J, Quinn L, Zuckerman S
Department of Family Practice, Cook County Hospital, and University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(9):1267-76. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00192-0.
During the last two decades the illness narrative has emerged as a popular North American literary form. Through poignant stories, well-educated patients have recounted their struggle with disabling diseases as well as with the hospitals and health care bureaucracies from whom they seek service. However, much less has been written about the doctor's narrative construction of chronic diseases either in the process of learning medicine or through diagnosing, treating and counseling chronically ill patients. Indeed, following Kleinman's lead, the physician's narrative has been narrowly viewed as a discourse on the verifiable manifestations of pathophysiology. Drawing on contemporary theories of storytelling--including the conception of narrative as conversational interaction--the present paper argues that doctor narratives are equally complex if quite different than patient stories. Indeed, through an analysis of doctor talk centering on diabetes mellitus collected in several distinct venues--case presentations, narrative interviews and medical consultations--it is argued that physician stories not only employ very evocative tropes, but that these stories combine didactic, rhetorical and soterological elements in the telling. The research was conducted at two, urban family practice training sites in Chicago.
在过去二十年中,疾病叙事已成为一种流行的北美文学形式。通过辛酸的故事,受过良好教育的患者讲述了他们与致残性疾病以及他们寻求服务的医院和医疗保健官僚机构的斗争。然而,关于医生在学习医学过程中或通过诊断、治疗和咨询慢性病患者对慢性病的叙事构建,所写的内容要少得多。事实上,在克莱曼的引领下,医生的叙事被狭义地视为关于病理生理学可验证表现的论述。借鉴当代讲故事的理论——包括将叙事视为对话互动的概念——本文认为医生的叙事同样复杂,尽管与患者的故事截然不同。的确,通过对在几个不同场所收集的以糖尿病为中心的医生谈话进行分析——病例报告、叙事访谈和医疗咨询——可以认为医生的故事不仅运用了非常引人联想的比喻,而且这些故事在讲述过程中融合了说教、修辞和救赎学元素。这项研究是在芝加哥的两个城市家庭医疗培训地点进行的。