Suppr超能文献

[魁北克地区两家诊所输精管切除术的疗效与并发症]

[Efficacy and complications associated with vasectomies in two clinics in the Quebec region].

作者信息

Labrecque M, Bédard L, Laperrière L

机构信息

Département de médecine familiale de l'Université Laval.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 1998 Sep;44:1860-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of, and complications associated with, vasectomies performed in two medical clinics. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A private medical clinic and a family planning clinic at a teaching hospital in the Quebec City region, where one doctor performs all surgery. PARTICIPANTS: The 1223 men who underwent a first vasectomy between January 1994 and February 1996. INTERVENTIONS: Isolations of the vas deferens through the scrotum was performed using the no-scalpel technique in both clinics. At the private clinic (n = 775), vasectomy was performed by ligature with tantalum clips. At the family planning clinic (n = 448), a combination of cauterisation of the abdominal end of the vas deferens, leaving the testicular end open, and fascial interposition with a clip was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of postoperative complications (painful granuloma; noninfectious inflammation of the vas deferens, epididymis, and testes; hematoma; infection; undiagnosed pain) and rate of recanalization (early and late). RESULTS: At the private clinic, 39 patients (5.0%) consulted for postoperative complications, compared with 55 patients (12.3%) at the family planning clinic (chi (2)1 = 21.0; P < 0.001). Of the patients who underwent semen analysis, 15 (2.8%) at the private clinic and 4 (1.2%) at the family planning clinic experienced early or late recanalization (chi (2)1 = 2.2; P < .14). CONCLUSION: The rate of consultation for postoperative complications was lower at the private clinic than at the family planning clinic, but the efficacy of the procedure appeared to be higher at the family planning clinic. The surgical techniques used at the two clinics might partially explain these differences.

摘要

目的

比较两家医疗诊所进行输精管切除术的疗效及相关并发症。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

魁北克市地区一家私立医疗诊所和一家教学医院的计划生育诊所,所有手术均由一名医生实施。

参与者

1994年1月至1996年2月期间接受首次输精管切除术的1223名男性。

干预措施

两家诊所均采用无手术刀技术经阴囊分离输精管。在私立诊所(n = 775),输精管切除术采用钽夹结扎。在计划生育诊所(n = 448),采用输精管腹部端烧灼并使睾丸端开放,同时用夹子进行筋膜置入的联合方法。

主要观察指标

术后并发症发生率(疼痛性肉芽肿;输精管、附睾和睾丸的非感染性炎症;血肿;感染;不明原因疼痛)及再通率(早期和晚期)。

结果

私立诊所39例患者(5.0%)因术后并发症就诊,而计划生育诊所为55例患者(12.3%)(χ²1 = 21.0;P < 0.001)。在接受精液分析的患者中,私立诊所15例(2.8%)、计划生育诊所4例(1.2%)出现早期或晚期再通(χ²1 = 2.2;P < 0.14)。

结论

私立诊所术后并发症就诊率低于计划生育诊所,但计划生育诊所手术效果似乎更高。两家诊所采用的手术技术可能部分解释了这些差异。

相似文献

3
Vasal sterilization in China.中国的输精管绝育术。
Contraception. 1993 Sep;48(3):255-65. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90144-v.
6
Open-ended vasectomy: an assessment.开放式输精管切除术:一项评估。
Fertil Steril. 1986 Jun;45(6):843-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49404-5.
10
A comparison of open-end versus closed-end vasectomies: a report on 6220 cases.
Contraception. 1992 Dec;46(6):521-5. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90116-b.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验