Moinpour C M, Savage M J, Troxel A, Lovato L C, Eisenberger M, Veith R W, Higgins B, Skeel R, Yee M, Blumenstein B A, Crawford E D, Meyskens F L
Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Oct 21;90(20):1537-44. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.20.1537.
For patients with metastatic prostate cancer, treatment is primarily palliative, relying mainly on the suppression of systemic androgen hormone levels. To help document the achievement of palliation and to characterize positive and negative effects of treatment, we evaluated quality-of-life (QOL) parameters in patients with metastatic prostate cancer who were randomly assigned to two methods of androgen deprivation.
Patients (n = 739) with stage M1 (bone or soft tissue metastasis) prostate cancer were enrolled in a QOL protocol that was a companion to Southwest Oncology Group INT-0105, a randomized double-blind trial comparing treatment with bilateral orchiectomy (surgical castration) plus either flutamide or placebo. Patients completed a comprehensive battery of QOL questionnaires at random assignment to treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months later. Data were collected on three treatment-specific symptoms (diarrhea, gas pain, and body image), on physical functioning, and on emotional functioning. All P values are two-sided.
Questionnaire return rates for this study never dropped below 80%; only 2% of the patients did not submit baseline QOL assessments. Cross-sectional analyses (corrected for multiple testing) identified statistically significant differences that favored orchiectomy plus placebo for two of the five primary QOL parameters as follows: patients receiving flutamide reported more diarrhea at 3 months (P = .001) and worse emotional functioning at 3 and 6 months (both P<.003). Longitudinal analyses replicated these findings. Other analyzed QOL parameters favored the group receiving placebo but were not statistically significant after adjustment for multiple testing.
We found a consistent pattern of better QOL outcomes at each follow-up assessment during the first 6 months of treatment for orchiectomized patients with metastatic prostate cancer who received placebo versus flutamide. Improvement over time was evident in both treatment groups but more so for patients receiving placebo.
对于转移性前列腺癌患者,治疗主要是姑息性的,主要依靠抑制全身雄激素水平。为了帮助记录姑息治疗的效果并描述治疗的正负效应,我们评估了随机分配接受两种雄激素剥夺方法的转移性前列腺癌患者的生活质量(QOL)参数。
患有M1期(骨或软组织转移)前列腺癌的患者(n = 739)参加了一项QOL方案,该方案是西南肿瘤学组INT-0105的配套研究,INT-0105是一项随机双盲试验,比较双侧睾丸切除术(手术去势)加氟他胺或安慰剂的治疗效果。患者在随机分配接受治疗时以及之后1、3和6个月完成了一系列全面的QOL问卷。收集了三种特定于治疗的症状(腹泻、气痛和身体形象)、身体功能和情绪功能的数据。所有P值均为双侧。
本研究的问卷回收率从未低于80%;只有2%的患者未提交基线QOL评估。横断面分析(校正多重检验)确定了在五个主要QOL参数中的两个方面,睾丸切除术加安慰剂组具有统计学显著差异,具体如下:接受氟他胺的患者在3个月时腹泻更多(P = .001),在3个月和6个月时情绪功能更差(均P<.003)。纵向分析重复了这些发现。其他分析的QOL参数有利于接受安慰剂的组,但在校正多重检验后无统计学显著性。
我们发现,在治疗的前6个月,接受安慰剂而非氟他胺的转移性前列腺癌睾丸切除患者在每次随访评估中QOL结果更好,且呈一致模式。两个治疗组随时间均有改善,但接受安慰剂的患者改善更明显。