• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟草产品责任诉讼传奇:回顾与未来展望

The saga of tobacco products liability litigation: a look back and a proposal for the future.

作者信息

Nusbaum N J

机构信息

Section of Geriatrics, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 1998 Oct;23(5):325-35. doi: 10.1023/a:1018721120980.

DOI:10.1023/a:1018721120980
PMID:9793830
Abstract

Recent developments in the courts have indicated an increased vulnerability of the tobacco industry to civil lawsuits brought because of tobacco-related illness. Much of the recent public discussion has dealt with how to attack the public health problem of childhood smoking, and the judicial system may also be of help in this effort. Antitrust law may be of particular benefit in dealing with tobacco promotion to children.

摘要

法庭上的最新进展表明,烟草行业在因烟草相关疾病引发的民事诉讼中越来越容易受到攻击。最近的许多公众讨论都围绕如何解决儿童吸烟这一公共卫生问题展开,司法系统在这方面也可能有所帮助。反垄断法在应对针对儿童的烟草促销活动方面可能会特别有用。

相似文献

1
The saga of tobacco products liability litigation: a look back and a proposal for the future.烟草产品责任诉讼传奇:回顾与未来展望
J Community Health. 1998 Oct;23(5):325-35. doi: 10.1023/a:1018721120980.
2
Applying lessons from tobacco litigation to obesity lawsuits.将烟草诉讼的经验教训应用于肥胖症诉讼。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jan;30(1):82-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.036.
3
Tobacco litigation: a mid-course review.烟草诉讼:中期回顾。
Cancer Causes Control. 2001 May;12(4):383-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1011248512615.
4
The role of litigation in tobacco control.诉讼在烟草控制中的作用。
Salud Publica Mex. 2006;48 Suppl 1:S121-36. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342006000700015.
5
The "global settlement" with the tobacco industry: 6 years later.与烟草行业的“全球和解协议”:6年后。
Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):218-24. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.218.
6
Tobacco litigation: good for the body but not the body politic.烟草诉讼:对身体有益,但对政治实体不利。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999 Aug;24(4):805-10. doi: 10.1215/03616878-24-4-805.
7
Litigation and public health policy making: the case of tobacco control.诉讼与公共卫生政策制定:以烟草控制为例
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999 Aug;24(4):769-804. doi: 10.1215/03616878-24-4-769.
8
Tobacco litigation and legislation.烟草诉讼与立法
Head Neck. 2000 Oct;22(7):643-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0347(200010)22:7<643::aid-hed1>3.0.co;2-w.
9
Epidemiology of the third wave of tobacco litigation in the United States, 1994-2005.1994 - 2005年美国第三次烟草诉讼浪潮的流行病学研究
Tob Control. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv9-16. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.016725.
10
Tobacco litigation, round three: it's the money and the principle.烟草诉讼,第三轮:关乎金钱与原则。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999 Aug;24(4):811-4. doi: 10.1215/03616878-24-4-811.

本文引用的文献

1
FDA regulations restricting the sale and distribution of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco to protect children and adolescents (executive summary).美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关于限制香烟和无烟烟草销售与分销以保护儿童和青少年的规定(执行摘要)
Tob Control. 1996 Autumn;5(3):236-46. doi: 10.1136/tc.5.3.236.
2
Tobacco liability litigation as a cancer control strategy.烟草责任诉讼作为一种癌症控制策略。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Mar 2;80(1):9-13. doi: 10.1093/jnci/80.1.9.
3
From the Office of the General Counsel. Tobacco advertising and the first amendment.
来自总法律顾问办公室。烟草广告与第一修正案。
JAMA. 1990 Sep 26;264(12):1593-4.