• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌筛查——密苏里州的一项医生调查。

Prostate cancer screening--a physician survey in Missouri.

作者信息

Lawson D A, Simoes E J, Sharp D, Murayi T, Hagan R, Brownson R C, Wilkerson J

机构信息

School of Public Health, Saint Louis University, MO 63108-3342, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 1998 Oct;23(5):347-58. doi: 10.1023/a:1018745821888.

DOI:10.1023/a:1018745821888
PMID:9793832
Abstract

This study investigated prostate cancer screening practices using prostate specific antigen testing (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) by primary care physicians in Missouri. In 1993, a mail survey was sent to a stratified random sample of 750 physicians whose primary specialty was general practice, family practice, or internal medicine. Three separate mailings resulted in an overall adjusted response rate of 60 percent. Ninety-five percent of physicians were more inclined to use PSA compared with three years previously, with only 45 percent of physicians more inclined to use DRE. An increase in the use of PSA following a negative DRE was reported by 85 percent and a greater inclination to use TRUS following a positive PSA was reported by 90 percent Eighty-six percent agreed with the American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines on prostate cancer screening. Using logistic regression adjusted across levels of demographic and practice factors, prevalence odds ratios were derived with results indicating that agreement with ACS guidelines and being in private practice are strong predictors of a physician's inclination to routinely screen asymptomatic patients for prostate cancer. Our findings have provided baseline information on prostate cancer screening in Missouri and suggest that primary care physicians view PSA testing as a useful procedure and appear to be using it in a manner similar to the general pattern seen across the country.

摘要

本研究调查了密苏里州初级保健医生使用前列腺特异性抗原检测(PSA)、直肠指检(DRE)和经直肠超声检查(TRUS)进行前列腺癌筛查的情况。1993年,向750名主要专业为普通科、家庭科或内科的医生组成的分层随机样本发送了邮件调查问卷。三次单独邮寄的总体调整回复率为60%。与三年前相比,95%的医生更倾向于使用PSA,只有45%的医生更倾向于使用DRE。85%的医生报告称在DRE结果为阴性后使用PSA的情况有所增加,90%的医生报告称在PSA结果为阳性后更倾向于使用TRUS。86%的医生同意美国癌症协会(ACS)关于前列腺癌筛查的指南。通过对人口统计学和执业因素水平进行调整的逻辑回归分析,得出患病率比值比,结果表明,同意ACS指南和从事私人执业是医生倾向于对无症状患者进行常规前列腺癌筛查的有力预测因素。我们的研究结果提供了密苏里州前列腺癌筛查的基线信息,并表明初级保健医生将PSA检测视为一种有用的检查方法,且其使用方式似乎与全国普遍模式相似。

相似文献

1
Prostate cancer screening--a physician survey in Missouri.前列腺癌筛查——密苏里州的一项医生调查。
J Community Health. 1998 Oct;23(5):347-58. doi: 10.1023/a:1018745821888.
2
Prostate cancer screening. What family physicians believe is best.前列腺癌筛查。家庭医生认为什么是最佳做法。
Arch Fam Med. 1995 Apr;4(4):317-22. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.4.317.
3
[Prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen: The views of general and laboratory physicians].[使用前列腺特异性抗原进行前列腺癌筛查:普通医生和检验医生的观点]
Semergen. 2018 Sep;44(6):409-419. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
Prostate-specific antigen screening: An update of physician beliefs and practices.前列腺特异性抗原筛查:医生观念和实践的更新。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103:66-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 6.
5
Australian general practitioners' views and use of tests to detect early prostate cancer.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998;22(3 Suppl):374-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01394.x.
6
African american primary care physicians' prostate cancer screening practices.非裔美国初级保健医生的前列腺癌筛查实践。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):36-43. doi: 10.1177/2150131913507454. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
7
Attitudes and practices of primary care physicians for prostate cancer screening.初级保健医生对前列腺癌筛查的态度和做法。
Am J Prev Med. 1996 Jul-Aug;12(4):277-81.
8
Gender differences in the practice of adult primary care physicians.成年初级保健医生执业中的性别差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 Jul-Aug;13(6):703-12. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2004.13.703.
9
Prostate specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: knowledge of, attitudes towards, and utilization among primary care physicians.前列腺特异性抗原筛查前列腺癌:初级保健医生的知识、态度和利用情况。
Urol Oncol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2):155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.12.019. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
10
Skin cancer screening by Australian family physicians: variation with physician beliefs and geographic locality.澳大利亚家庭医生的皮肤癌筛查:因医生观念和地理位置而异。
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Aug;17(2):142-6. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00053-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in prostate specific antigen testing in Ireland: lessons from a country without guidelines.爱尔兰前列腺特异性抗原检测趋势:无指南国家的经验教训。
Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Mar;179(1):43-9. doi: 10.1007/s11845-009-0376-7. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
2
Prostate-specific antigen testing among the elderly in community-based family medicine practices.社区家庭医疗实践中老年人的前列腺特异性抗原检测
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):257-65. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.03.080136.
3
Factors prompting PSA-testing of asymptomatic men in a country with no guidelines: a national survey of general practitioners.

本文引用的文献

1
Controversies in prostate cancer screening. Analogies to the early lung cancer screening debate.前列腺癌筛查中的争议。与早期肺癌筛查辩论的类比。
JAMA. 1996 Dec 25;276(24):1976-9.
2
Recommendations of the first Michigan conference on prostate cancer.第一届密歇根前列腺癌会议的建议。
Urology. 1996 Oct;48(4):519-33; discussion 533-4. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00241-5.
3
General practitioners' attitudes to screening for prostate and testicular cancers.
Med J Aust. 1995 Apr 17;162(8):410-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb139968.x.
在一个没有相关指南的国家,促使无症状男性进行前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的因素:一项针对全科医生的全国性调查
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Jan 12;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-3.
4
Effect of guidelines on primary care physician use of PSA screening: results from the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey.指南对基层医疗医生进行前列腺特异性抗原筛查的影响:社区追踪研究医生调查结果
Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):681-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08315243. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
5
A national survey of medical students' beliefs and knowledge in screening for prostate cancer.一项关于医学生对前列腺癌筛查的信念和知识的全国性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jan;22(1):80-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0015-1.
6
Adoption of liquid-based cervical cancer screening tests by family physicians and gynecologists.家庭医生和妇科医生对液基宫颈癌筛查检测的采用情况。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):927-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00265.x.
7
Physician perspectives on the importance of facts men ought to know about prostate-specific antigen testing.医生对男性应该了解的前列腺特异性抗原检测相关事实重要性的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May;18(5):350-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20626.x.
8
Informed consent for cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: how well are men getting the message?关于前列腺特异性抗原癌症筛查的知情同意:男性对这一信息的了解程度如何?
Am J Public Health. 2003 May;93(5):779-85. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.5.779.
4
An evaluation of prostate-specific antigen as a screening test for prostate cancer.前列腺特异性抗原作为前列腺癌筛查检测方法的评估。
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Nov 22;153(22):2529-37.
5
Screening for prostate cancer: commentary on the recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Am J Prev Med. 1994 Jul-Aug;10(4):187-93.
6
Screening for prostate cancer. A decision analytic view.前列腺癌筛查。一种决策分析视角。
JAMA. 1994 Sep 14;272(10):773-80.
7
The importance of assessing the fit of logistic regression models: a case study.评估逻辑回归模型拟合优度的重要性:一项案例研究。
Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1630-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1630.
8
Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen.
J Urol. 1990 Jun;143(6):1146-52; discussion 1152-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40211-4.