• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Mammography and the politics of randomised controlled trials.乳腺X线摄影与随机对照试验的政治学
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1224-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1224.
2
Screening by mammography.
JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1362. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.279425.
3
A brief history of the randomized controlled trial. From oranges and lemons to the gold standard.随机对照试验简史。从橙子和柠檬到金标准。
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000 Aug;14(4):745-60, vii. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70309-9.
4
The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force.美国预防服务工作组2009年乳腺癌筛查建议。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):162-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1989.
5
Randomised controlled trial of anti-smoking advice in pregnancy. 1977.孕期戒烟建议的随机对照试验。1977年。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Jun;50(3):232-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.3.232.
6
Do we really want broad access to health care?我们真的希望医疗保健能够广泛普及吗？
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 24;352(12):1260-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb043863.
7
Neuroreconciliation and the health care debate.
Ann Neurol. 2010 Apr;67(4):A5-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.22044.
8
Correlation is not causation.相关并不意味着因果关系。
Am J Public Health. 1998 May;88(5):832-3; discussion 834-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.5.832.
9
Breast cancer screening: a 35-year perspective.乳腺癌筛查：35 年的视角。
Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33:165-75. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr003. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
10
Mobile clinics for women's and children's health.妇女儿童健康流动诊所。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 11;2016(8):CD009677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009677.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Overlap of high-risk individuals predicted by family history, and genetic and non-genetic breast cancer risk prediction models: implications for risk stratification.家族史、遗传和非遗传乳腺癌风险预测模型预测的高危人群重叠：对风险分层的影响。
BMC Med. 2022 Apr 26;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02334-z.
2
Randomised controlled trials in psychiatry: important but poorly accepted.精神病学中的随机对照试验：重要但接受度低。
BMJ. 1999 Aug 28;319(7209):562-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7209.562.
3
Guidelines in small countries and not translated into English may be ignored.小国制定的且未翻译成英文的指南可能会被忽视。
BMJ. 1999 Apr 3;318(7188):942. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.942b.

本文引用的文献

1
Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment.接受进一步乳房筛查检查的女性会遭受不良心理影响吗？一项多中心随访研究，比较了不同乳房筛查结果组在其最后一次乳房筛查预约五个月后的情况。
J Public Health Med. 1998 Dec;20(4):396-403. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024793.
2
The Gothenburg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization.哥德堡乳腺筛查试验：随机分组时年龄在39 - 49岁女性的死亡率、发病率及检测方式的初步结果。
Cancer. 1997 Dec 1;80(11):2091-9.
3
Breast screening: adverse psychological consequences one month after placing women on early recall because of a diagnostic uncertainty. A multicentre study.乳房筛查：因诊断不确定而将女性列入早期召回名单一个月后的不良心理后果。一项多中心研究。
J Med Screen. 1997;4(3):158-68. doi: 10.1177/096914139700400309.
4
NIH Consensus Statement. Breast cancer screening for women ages 40-49.美国国立卫生研究院共识声明。40 - 49岁女性的乳腺癌筛查
NIH Consens Statement. 1997;15(1):1-35.
5
Mammography screening for women aged 40 through 49--a guidelines saga and a clarion call for informed decision making.针对40至49岁女性的乳房X光筛查——一段指南历程及对明智决策的强烈呼吁。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Jul;87(7):1103-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1103.
6
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel.美国国立卫生研究院共识发展会议声明：40 - 49岁女性乳腺癌筛查，1997年1月21 - 23日。美国国立卫生研究院共识发展小组。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Jul 16;89(14):1015-26. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.14.1015.
7
Screening mammography: effect of national guidelines on current physician practice.乳腺钼靶筛查：国家指南对当前医生实践的影响。
Radiology. 1997 May;203(2):335-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114084.
8
Screening could seriously damage your health.筛查可能会严重损害你的健康。
BMJ. 1997 Feb 22;314(7080):533-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.533.
9
The breast-screening brawl.
Science. 1997 Feb 21;275(5303):1056-9. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5303.1056.
10
Randomization in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a review for evidence of subversion.加拿大全国乳腺筛查研究中的随机化：对颠覆证据的综述
CMAJ. 1997 Jan 15;156(2):193-9.

Mammography and the politics of randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Wells J

机构信息

Health Services Research Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF.

出版信息

BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1224-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1224.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1224
PMID:9794866
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1114163/
Abstract
摘要