Gordon J A, An L C, Hayward R A, Williams B C
Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, the Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, and the Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;32(5):569-73. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70034-4.
To identify diagnostic predictors of return emergency department visits, and to compare actual and perceived associations between initial ED diagnosis and revisits to help identify target diagnoses for prevention strategies.
This 2-part study involved a retrospective observational study and a health professional survey. The study population consisted of all patients with 2 or more visits to the University of Michigan ED within a 3-day period between July 1995 and June 1996 ("early-return visitors"). Billing records identified the initial diagnoses of subsequent return visitors. The prevalence of each initial diagnosis was determined in the general ED population (n=52,553), early-return population (n=1,422), and early-return population admitted to the hospital ("return-admit," n=313). Surveys were distributed to all ED health professionals to assess their perception of the diagnoses most likely to return within 3 days. Relative risk (RR) ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Dehydration was the most common diagnosis in the general, early-return, and return-admit populations (prevalence: 7%, 15%, 25%, respectively). Dehydration was also the diagnosis with the highest risk for both early return and subsequent admission on early return (RR [95% CI]: 2.3 [2.0-2.6], 1.8 [1.5-2.3], respectively). Nearly two thirds of health professionals, however, did not identify dehydration as a diagnosis at high risk for return, and almost half did not consider dehydration a high risk for admission.
Initial ED diagnosis may be a useful predictor of early ED return and admission. Patients with an initial diagnosis of dehydration are at particularly high risk for early return and admission, yet providers underestimate the risk in this very common group. Screening a return ED population for high-frequency diagnoses may reveal underrecognized target groups for specific prevention strategies.
确定复诊至急诊科的诊断预测因素,并比较初始急诊科诊断与复诊之间的实际关联和感知关联,以帮助确定预防策略的目标诊断。
这项分为两部分的研究包括一项回顾性观察研究和一项卫生专业人员调查。研究人群包括在1995年7月至1996年6月期间3天内两次或更多次就诊于密歇根大学急诊科的所有患者(“早期复诊患者”)。计费记录确定了后续复诊患者的初始诊断。在普通急诊科人群(n = 52,553)、早期复诊人群(n = 1,422)和入院的早期复诊人群(“复诊入院”,n = 313)中确定每种初始诊断的患病率。向所有急诊科卫生专业人员发放调查问卷,以评估他们对最有可能在3天内复诊的诊断的看法。计算相对风险(RR)比值和95%置信区间(CI)。
脱水是普通人群、早期复诊人群和复诊入院人群中最常见的诊断(患病率分别为7%、15%、25%)。脱水也是早期复诊和早期复诊后后续入院风险最高的诊断(RR [95% CI]:分别为2.3 [2.0 - 2.6]、1.8 [1.5 - 2.3])。然而,近三分之二的卫生专业人员未将脱水识别为复诊高风险诊断,近一半的人未认为脱水是入院高风险因素。
初始急诊科诊断可能是早期复诊至急诊科和入院的有用预测因素。初始诊断为脱水的患者早期复诊和入院风险特别高,但医护人员低估了这个非常常见群体中的风险。对复诊急诊科人群进行高频诊断筛查可能会揭示特定预防策略未被充分认识的目标群体。