• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词汇歧义消解中句子约束的来源。

Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution.

作者信息

Vu H, Kellas G, Paul S T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1998 Sep;26(5):979-1001. doi: 10.3758/bf03201178.

DOI:10.3758/bf03201178
PMID:9796231
Abstract

Results from a series of naming experiments demonstrated that major lexical categories of simple sentences can provide sources of constraint on the interpretation of ambiguous words (homonyms). Manipulation of verb (Experiment 1) or subject noun (Experiment 2) specificity produced contexts that were empirically rated as being strongly biased or ambiguous. Priming was demonstrated for target words related to both senses of a homonym following ambiguous sentences, but only contextually appropriate target words were primed following strongly biased dominant or subordinate sentences. Experiment 3 showed an increase in the magnitude of priming when multiple constraints on activation converged. Experiments 4 and 5 eliminated combinatorial intralexical priming as an alternative explanation. Instead, it was demonstrated that each constraint was influential only insofar as it contributed to the overall semantic representation of the sentence. When the multiple sources of constraint were retained but the sentence-level representation was changed (Experiment 4) or eliminated (Experiment 5), the results of Experiments 1, 2, and 3 and were not replicated. Experiment 6 examined the issue of homonym exposure duration by using an 80-msec stimulus onset asynchrony. The results replicated the previous experiments. The overall evidence indicates that a sentence context can be made strongly and immediately constraining by the inclusion of specific fillers for salient lexical categories. The results are discussed within a constraint-based, context-sensitive model of lexical ambiguity resolution.

摘要

一系列命名实验的结果表明,简单句子的主要词汇类别可以为歧义单词(同音异义词)的解释提供限制来源。对动词(实验1)或主语名词(实验2)特异性的操纵产生了经实证评估为强烈偏向或模糊的语境。在歧义句子之后,与同音异义词的两种意义相关的目标词都出现了启动效应,但在强烈偏向的主导或从属句子之后,只有上下文合适的目标词出现了启动效应。实验3表明,当激活的多种限制因素趋同的时候,启动效应的强度会增加。实验4和实验5排除了组合性词内启动效应作为另一种解释。相反,研究表明,每个限制因素只有在有助于句子的整体语义表征时才具有影响力。当保留多种限制因素来源,但改变句子层面的表征(实验4)或消除句子层面的表征(实验5)时,实验1、2和3的结果并未得到重复。实验6通过使用80毫秒的刺激开始异步时间来研究同音异义词暴露持续时间的问题。结果重复了先前的实验。总体证据表明,通过为显著的词汇类别纳入特定的填充词,可以使句子语境具有强烈且即时的限制性。研究结果在基于限制的、上下文敏感的词汇歧义消解模型中进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution.词汇歧义消解中句子约束的来源。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Sep;26(5):979-1001. doi: 10.3758/bf03201178.
2
The influence of global discourse on lexical ambiguity resolution.全球话语对词汇歧义消解的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Mar;28(2):236-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03213803.
3
Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect.话语语境强度作为从属偏差效应的一个决定因素。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1999 Nov;52(4):813-39. doi: 10.1080/713755861.
4
Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.在语境中理解词汇:阅读过程中词汇与句子层面信息的交互作用。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Mar;19(1):59-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022.
5
Hemispheric differences in context sensitivity during lexical ambiguity resolution.词汇歧义消解过程中上下文敏感性的半球差异。
Brain Lang. 1998 Dec;65(3):361-94. doi: 10.1006/brln.1998.1998.
6
Understanding words in sentence contexts: the time course of ambiguity resolution.在句子语境中理解单词:歧义消解的时间进程。
Brain Lang. 2003 Aug;86(2):326-43. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00547-3.
7
Sentence context and lexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres.两个半球对句子语境和词汇歧义的解析
Neuropsychologia. 1998 Sep;36(9):827-35. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00042-6.
8
Ambiguous words in sentences: brain indices for native and non-native disambiguation.句子中的歧义词汇:用于母语和非母语歧义消解的大脑指标。
Neurosci Lett. 2007 Feb 27;414(1):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 3.
9
Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.词汇和信息层面的句子语境对阅读注视时间的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jan;20(1):92-103. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.1.92.
10
Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI.句子语境中的语义歧义处理:来自事件相关功能磁共振成像的证据。
Neuroimage. 2007 Feb 1;34(3):1270-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.048. Epub 2006 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Processing of Lexical Ambiguity: Evidence from Child and Adult Greek.词汇歧义的加工:来自儿童和成人希腊语的证据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Feb 22;53(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10063-y.
2
Cognitive Science Progresses Toward Interactive Frameworks.认知科学朝着交互式框架发展。
Top Cogn Sci. 2023 Apr;15(2):219-254. doi: 10.1111/tops.12645. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
3
Is theology more of a field than a father is a king? Modelling semantic relatedness in processing literal and metaphorical statements.神学是否比父亲更像一个领域?在处理字面和隐喻陈述时对语义相关性建模。

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: evidence from eye fixations and naming times.词汇和概念限制对混合语言句子阅读的影响:来自眼动注视和命名时间的证据。
Mem Cognit. 1996 Jul;24(4):477-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03200936.
2
Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.词汇和信息层面的句子语境对阅读注视时间的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jan;20(1):92-103. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.1.92.
3
University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1461-1471. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02072-6. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
4
Activation of shape and semantic information during ambiguous homophone processing: eye tracking evidence from Hindi.歧义同音词加工过程中形状和语义信息的激活:来自印地语的眼动追踪证据
Cogn Process. 2014 Nov;15(4):451-65. doi: 10.1007/s10339-014-0622-4. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
5
How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: the current state of the literature.语义相似性如何影响歧义词语处理:文献综述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):13-37. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0665-7.
6
Morphemic ambiguity resolution in Chinese: activation of the subordinate meaning with a prior dominant-biased context.汉语语素歧义消解:在先的优势语境对次要语义的激活。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Dec;17(6):875-81. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.6.875.
7
LIFG-based attentional control and the resolution of lexical ambiguities in sentence context.基于 LIFG 的注意控制与句子语境中词汇歧义的消解。
Brain Lang. 2011 Jan;116(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
8
Dominance and context effects on activation of alternative homophone meanings.优势及语境对同音异形异义词其他含义激活的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Oct;36(7):1306-23. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1306.
9
The divided visual world paradigm: eye tracking reveals hemispheric asymmetries in lexical ambiguity resolution.分离视觉世界范式:眼动追踪揭示词汇歧义消解中的半球不对称性。
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 30;1222:166-83. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.033. Epub 2008 May 21.
10
Development of lexical and sentence level context effects for dominant and subordinate word meanings of homonyms.同音异义词的主导和从属词义在词汇和句子层面语境效应的发展。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2006 Nov;35(6):531-54. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9028-5.
阿尔伯塔大学566个同形异义词的相对意义频率规范。
Mem Cognit. 1994 Jan;22(1):111-26. doi: 10.3758/bf03202766.
4
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected].句法歧义消解的词汇性质[已修正]
Psychol Rev. 1994 Oct;101(4):676-703. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676.
5
A discourse on semantic priming.关于语义启动的论述。
Cogn Psychol. 1982 Oct;14(4):590-607. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90020-2.
6
Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.词汇歧义及其在单词识别模型中的作用。
Psychol Bull. 1984 Sep;96(2):316-40.
7
On priming by a sentence context.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1983 Mar;112(1):1-36. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.112.1.1.
8
Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.阅读理解中的范式与过程。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1982 Jun;111(2):228-38. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.111.2.228.
9
Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.识别单词对的促进作用:检索操作之间依赖性的证据。
J Exp Psychol. 1971 Oct;90(2):227-34. doi: 10.1037/h0031564.
10
Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.阅读中的词汇复杂性与注视时间:词频、动词复杂性及词汇歧义的影响
Mem Cognit. 1986 May;14(3):191-201. doi: 10.3758/bf03197692.