• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

顺式阿曲库铵与阿曲库铵的神经肌肉阻滞作用及恢复情况比较。

A comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effects and reversibility of cisatracurium and atracurium.

作者信息

Carroll M T, Mirakhur R K, Lowry D, Glover P, Kerr C J

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics, Queen's University of Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1998 Aug;53(8):744-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00530.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00530.x
PMID:9797517
Abstract

The neuromuscular blocking effects and the reversibility of cisatracurium 0.1 or 0.15 mg.kg-1 were compared with those of atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1 during anaesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Neuromuscular block was monitored using train-of-four stimulation while recording the mechanomyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle. The block was either allowed to recover spontaneously or was antagonised with neostigmine 50 micrograms.kg-1 at 10% or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four. The median times to maximum block were 2.7, 2.2 and 1.5 min following cisatracurium 0.1 and 0.15 mg.kg-1 and atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1, respectively. After cisatracurium 0.1 mg.kg-1 had been given, the median time to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.8 ('adequate recovery') was 74 min during spontaneous recovery, 48 min after reversal with neostigmine when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 10% of control and 50 min after reversal when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 25% of control. These times for cisatracurium 0.15 mg.kg-1 and atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1 were 90, 66 and 57 min and 75, 56 and 54 min, respectively. Administration of neostigmine significantly shortened the time to adequate recovery for both drugs but there were no significant differences in the case of either neuromuscular blocking drug between the groups of patients given neostigmine at 10 or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four.

摘要

在丙泊酚、氧化亚氮和异氟烷麻醉期间,比较了0.1或0.15mg.kg-1顺式阿曲库铵与0.5mg.kg-1阿曲库铵的神经肌肉阻滞作用及可逆性。使用四个成串刺激监测神经肌肉阻滞,同时记录拇内收肌的肌机械反应。阻滞可任其自发恢复,或在四个成串刺激的第一个颤搐恢复到10%或25%时用50μg.kg-1新斯的明拮抗。给予0.1和0.15mg.kg-1顺式阿曲库铵及0.5mg.kg-1阿曲库铵后,达到最大阻滞的中位时间分别为2.7、2.2和1.5分钟。给予0.1mg.kg-1顺式阿曲库铵后,四个成串刺激比值恢复到0.8(“充分恢复”)的中位时间,自发恢复时为74分钟,四个成串刺激的第一个颤搐恢复到对照值的10%时用新斯的明拮抗后为48分钟,四个成串刺激的第一个颤搐恢复到对照值的25%时用新斯的明拮抗后为50分钟。0.15mg.kg-1顺式阿曲库铵和0.5mg.kg-1阿曲库铵的这些时间分别为90、66和57分钟以及75、56和54分钟。新斯的明给药显著缩短了两种药物达到充分恢复的时间,但在四个成串刺激的第一个颤搐恢复到10%或25%时给予新斯的明的两组患者中,两种神经肌肉阻滞药物之间均无显著差异。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effects and reversibility of cisatracurium and atracurium.顺式阿曲库铵与阿曲库铵的神经肌肉阻滞作用及恢复情况比较。
Anaesthesia. 1998 Aug;53(8):744-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00530.x.
2
A comparison of cisatracurium and atracurium: onset of neuromuscular block after bolus injection and recovery after subsequent infusion.顺式阿曲库铵与阿曲库铵的比较:单次注射后神经肌肉阻滞的起效时间及随后持续输注后的恢复情况。
Anesth Analg. 1996 Nov;83(5):1072-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199611000-00030.
3
Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine antagonism of atracurium and cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block.依酚氯铵和新斯的明拮抗阿曲库铵和顺式阿曲库铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞的剂量-反应关系。
Can J Anaesth. 2000 Nov;47(11):1074-81. doi: 10.1007/BF03027958.
4
The clinical neuromuscular pharmacology of cisatracurium versus vecuronium during outpatient anesthesia.门诊麻醉期间顺式阿曲库铵与维库溴铵的临床神经肌肉药理学
Anesth Analg. 1997 Dec;85(6):1278-83. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199712000-00018.
5
[Influence of neostigmine on the course of neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium or cisatracurium: a randomized, double-blind trial].[新斯的明对罗库溴铵或顺式阿曲库铵神经肌肉阻滞过程的影响:一项随机双盲试验]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2007 Aug-Sep;54(7):399-404.
6
Neuromuscular blocking effects and train-of-four fade with cisatracurium: comparison with other nondepolarising relaxants.顺式阿曲库铵的神经肌肉阻滞作用及四个成串刺激衰减:与其他非去极化肌松药的比较
Anaesthesia. 1998 Dec;53(12):1169-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00616.x.
7
Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine.与新斯的明用于顺式阿曲库铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞逆转相比,舒更葡糖用于罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞逆转更快。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):622-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen037. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
8
Optimum dose of neostigmine to reverse shallow neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium and cisatracurium.新斯的明逆转罗库溴铵和顺式阿曲库铵所致浅肌松时的最佳剂量。
Anaesthesia. 2016 Apr;71(4):443-9. doi: 10.1111/anae.13398. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
9
Neuromuscular blocking effects of cisatracurium and its antagonism with neostigmine in a canine model of autosomal-recessive centronuclear myopathy.顺式阿曲库铵在常染色体隐性中央核性肌病犬模型中的神经肌肉阻滞作用及其与新斯的明的拮抗作用
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):927-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev397.
10
Optimum time for neostigmine reversal of atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade.新斯的明拮抗阿曲库铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞的最佳时间。
Can J Anaesth. 1996 Sep;43(9):932-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03011807.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuromuscular Blockade Antagonism for Thyroid Surgery During Intraoperative Neural Monitoring-An Anesthesia Perspective.术中神经监测下甲状腺手术的神经肌肉阻滞拮抗——麻醉视角
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 27;61(3):420. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030420.
2
Evaluation of the three different doses of cisatracurium during general anaesthesia: A prospective randomized study.全身麻醉期间三种不同剂量顺式阿曲库铵的评估:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jan-Mar;40(1):69-74. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_253_22. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
Comparison of onset time, duration of action, and intubating conditions after cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg in young and elderly patients.
0.15mg/kg 顺式阿曲库铵在年轻和老年患者中起效时间、作用持续时间和插管条件的比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Nov 7;22(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01881-5.
4
Newer neuromuscular blocking agents: how do they compare with established agents?新型神经肌肉阻滞剂:与现有药物相比如何?
Drugs. 2001;61(7):919-42. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161070-00003.