Bailie R, London L
National Centre for Epidemiology and Populaion Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
S Afr Med J. 1998 Sep;88(9):1105-9.
The poor state of reporting of pesticide poisoning is widely recognised as a hindrance to the development of preventive programmes that aim to address this important cause of mortality and morbidity in farm workers. This study aimed to assess the extent to which notification could be improved by enhancing passive surveillance procedures.
An awareness campaign targeting a range of health care providers was conducted in a rural farming area. This included improving the availability of cholinesterase testing and encouraging all providers to notify on suspicion. Existing reporting forms were supplemented with additional questions, and notification took place through existing channels. The rate of notification in the study area was compared with that in surrounding areas and previous years.
Fourteen poisoning events involving 56 people were reported, with 2 events together accounting for 44 cases. All patients were hospitalised. Over 90% of cases occurred on farms, with the farm store being the most common source of pesticide. Only one case was notified by a general practitioner. The rate of notification in the study area was approximately tenfold that of previous years and of the surrounding area for the same year (P < 0.0001).
Although the enhanced surveillance programme resulted in an increase in notifications, the programme appears to have been ineffective in detecting mild cases of poisoning or in improving notification on suspicion by general practitioners.
农药中毒报告情况不佳被广泛认为是旨在解决农场工人这一重要死亡和发病原因的预防计划发展的障碍。本研究旨在评估通过加强被动监测程序可在多大程度上改善报告情况。
在一个农村农业地区针对一系列医疗保健提供者开展了一场宣传活动。这包括提高胆碱酯酶检测的可及性,并鼓励所有提供者在怀疑时进行报告。现有的报告表格补充了额外问题,报告通过现有渠道进行。将研究区域的报告率与周边地区及前几年的报告率进行比较。
报告了14起涉及56人的中毒事件,其中2起事件共涉及44例。所有患者均住院治疗。超过90%的病例发生在农场,农场仓库是最常见的农药来源。只有1例是由全科医生报告的。研究区域的报告率约为前几年及同年周边地区的10倍(P < 0.0001)。
尽管强化监测计划导致报告数量增加,但该计划在发现轻度中毒病例或改善全科医生基于怀疑的报告方面似乎效果不佳。