Owen-Smith V, Hannaford P C, Warskyj M, Ferry S, Kay C R
Royal College of General Practitioners' Manchester Research Unit.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jul;52(7):420-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.7.420.
To determine whether changes in smoking status among women recruited for the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study affected previous risk estimates for myocardial infarction.
(1) Postal survey between November 1994 and July 1995 of women still under general practitioner observation. Validation of the smoking information supplied by the women on the questionnaire by comparison with that reported by the general practitioner at recruitment to the main study. (2) Nested case-control study of 103 cases of myocardial infarction, matched with 309 controls, to see if different risk estimates were obtained when smoking status at recruitment or smoking status at time of event were used in the analysis.
650 general practices throughout the United Kingdom.
10,073 women who responded to the questionnaire (85.4% of 11,797 sent out).
There was good agreement between smoking information recorded by the general practitioner at recruitment and that supplied retrospectively by respondents to the questionnaire. The risk estimates for myocardial infarction associated with use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) were almost identical irrespective of whether smoking status at recruitment or at time of event was used for the statistical adjustment. This was because few women stopped smoking while also using COCs. In fact, fewer regular smokers who have ever used COCs reported stopping smoking than never users. The risk estimates for myocardial infarction associated with smoking were smaller when smoking habits at recruitment was used than when smoking habits at time of event was used.
Previous results from the Oral Contraception Study regarding the effects of COCs are unlikely to have been biased by changes in the smoking habits of the cohort, but the effects of smoking have probably been underestimated. There is still a need for effective health education regarding the risks associated with smoking, particularly among users of COCs.
确定皇家全科医师学院口服避孕药研究中招募女性的吸烟状况变化是否会影响先前对心肌梗死的风险估计。
(1)1994年11月至1995年7月对仍在全科医师观察下的女性进行邮寄调查。通过与主要研究招募时全科医师报告的吸烟信息进行比较,验证女性在问卷中提供的吸烟信息。(2)对103例心肌梗死病例与309例对照进行巢式病例对照研究,以观察在分析中使用招募时的吸烟状况或事件发生时的吸烟状况是否会得到不同的风险估计。
英国各地的650家全科诊所。
10,073名回复问卷的女性(占发出问卷的11,797人的85.4%)。
全科医师在招募时记录的吸烟信息与受访者在问卷中回顾性提供的信息之间具有良好的一致性。无论在统计调整中使用招募时的吸烟状况还是事件发生时的吸烟状况,与使用复方口服避孕药(COC)相关的心肌梗死风险估计几乎相同。这是因为很少有女性在使用COC的同时戒烟。事实上,曾经使用过COC的经常吸烟者报告戒烟的人数比从未使用者少。与使用事件发生时的吸烟习惯相比,使用招募时的吸烟习惯时与吸烟相关的心肌梗死风险估计较小。
口服避孕药研究先前关于COC影响的结果不太可能因队列吸烟习惯的变化而产生偏差,但吸烟的影响可能被低估了。仍然需要针对与吸烟相关的风险进行有效的健康教育,特别是在COC使用者中。