Suppr超能文献

Agreement among raters in assessment of physiologic waveforms recorded by a cardiorespiratory monitor for home use. Collaborative Home Infant Monitoring Evaluation (CHIME) Study Group.

作者信息

Corwin M J, Lister G, Silvestri J M, Peucker M, Brooks L J, Ward S L, Hunt C E, Neuman M R, Crowell D H, Colton T

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts 02118, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Res. 1998 Nov;44(5):682-90. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199811000-00010.

Abstract

There are numerous reports of cardiorespiratory patterns in infants on home monitors, but no data to determine whether "experts" agree on the description of these patterns. Therefore, we evaluated agreement among four experienced investigators and five trained technicians who assessed independently the same sample of physiologic waveforms recorded from infants enrolled in a multicenter study. The monitor used respiratory inductance plethysmography and recorded waveforms for apnea > or = 16 s or a heart rate < 80 beats/min for > or = 5 s. The investigators and technicians initially assessed 88 waveforms. After additional training, the technicians assessed another 113 additional waveforms. In categorizing waveforms as apnea present or absent, agreement among technicians improved considerably with additional training (kappa 0.65 to 0.85). For categorizing waveforms as having bradycardia present versus absent, the trends were the same. Agreement in measurement of apnea duration also improved considerably with additional training (intraclass correlation 0.33-0.83). Agreement in measurement of bradycardia duration was consistently excellent (intraclass correlation 0.86-0.99). Total agreement was achieved among technicians with additional training for measurement of the lowest heart rate during a bradycardia. When classifying apnea as including > or = 1, > or = 2, > or = 3, or > or = 4 out-of-phase breaths, agreement was initially low, but after additional training it improved, especially in categorization of apneas with > or = 3 or > or = 4 out-of-phase breaths (kappa 0.67 and 0.94, respectively). Although researchers and clinicians commonly describe events based on cardiorespiratory recordings, agreement amongst experienced individuals may be poor, which can confound interpretation. With clear guidelines and sufficient training raters can attain a high level of agreement in describing cardiorespiratory events.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验