García de la Rubia S, Pajarón Fernández M J, Martínez González-Moro I, Sánchez-Solís de Querol M, Pérez Flores D, Pajarón de Ahumada M
Centro de Atención Primaria de la Alberca, Murcia.
An Esp Pediatr. 1998 Sep;49(3):237-40.
Our aim was to study the behavior and validity of PEFR and FEV1 in the free-running exercise test in order to diagnose exercise-induced asthma during childhood.
We studied 30 asthmatic children and 30 healthy children as controls. A provocation test was performed by means of free-running exercise in an indoor sports center. Environmental temperature and humidity were equal in both groups. Forced breathing spirometry and the "Mini-Wright peak flow meter" test were recorded before and two, five, fifteen and twenty minutes after the exercise challenge. The spirometric values representing two standard deviations below the mean for each variable studied in the control group were considered as reference values (FEV1 > or = 83.5% and PEFR > or = 81.5%).
There was a decrease in FEV1 in 17 asthmatic children (56.7%) and a decrease in PEFR occurred in 14 children (46.7%). No statistically significant differences were found in either test. Specificity was 100% for FEV1 and 96.7% for PEFR. The greatest decrease in both spirometric parameters occurred at five minutes.
According to our results, in a free-running provocation test if we maintain previously controlled environmental conditions and exercise intensity "forced breathing spirometry" and "Mini-Wright peak flow" can be used interchangeably in order to diagnose exercise-induced asthma.
我们的目的是研究在自由跑步运动试验中呼气峰流速(PEFR)和第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的表现及有效性,以诊断儿童运动诱发哮喘。
我们研究了30例哮喘儿童,并以30例健康儿童作为对照。在室内体育中心通过自由跑步进行激发试验。两组的环境温度和湿度相同。在运动激发前以及激发后2分钟、5分钟、15分钟和20分钟记录用力呼吸肺量计检查结果及“微型赖特峰流速仪”测试结果。将代表对照组中所研究的每个变量均值以下两个标准差的肺量计数值视为参考值(FEV1≥83.5%且PEFR≥81.5%)。
17例哮喘儿童(56.7%)的FEV1下降,14例儿童(46.7%)的PEFR下降。两项测试均未发现统计学上的显著差异。FEV1的特异性为100%,PEFR的特异性为96.7%。两个肺量计参数的最大降幅出现在5分钟时。
根据我们的结果,在自由跑步激发试验中,如果我们维持先前控制的环境条件和运动强度,“用力呼吸肺量计检查”和“微型赖特峰流速测定”可交替使用以诊断运动诱发哮喘。