Hasleton P S
Pathol Eur. 1976;11(3):211-8.
Quantitative histological studies on the lung are time consuming and for the pathologist may not reveal much additional imformation in relation to the time spent. Sixty-eight cases of emphysema were studied. The percentages of the lung tissue destroyed by alveolar, bronchiolar and bullous emphysema were determined by macroscopic point counting. The internal surface area (I.S.A.) and internal surface area at a standard lung volume of 3,000 ml(I.S.A.3,000) were determined by the mean linear intercept (M.L.I.) method. There was a significant correlation between both the M.L.I. and I.S.A.3,000 and the percentage of lung tissue destroyed. The M.L.I. was the most accurate guide to the presence of emphysema. The I.S.A. was the least reliable indication of emphysema. Cases of alveolar duct emphysema were both over and underdiagnosed on macroscopic point counting. It is therefore suggested that in cases with alveolar duct emphysema, apparently normal lungs or where full pulmonary function tests are available, quantitative histological studies should be carried out. In other cases it is possible to derive the I.S.A. and I.S.A.3,000 from the percentage of emphysema as determined macroscopically, without recourse to histological methods.
对肺部进行定量组织学研究耗时较长,而且对于病理学家而言,与所花费的时间相比,可能无法获得太多额外信息。对68例肺气肿病例进行了研究。通过宏观点数法确定肺泡性、细支气管性和大疱性肺气肿所破坏的肺组织百分比。采用平均线性截距(M.L.I.)法测定内表面积(I.S.A.)以及标准肺容积为3000 ml时的内表面积(I.S.A.3000)。M.L.I.和I.S.A.3000与肺组织破坏百分比之间均存在显著相关性。M.L.I.是肺气肿存在与否的最准确指标。I.S.A.是肺气肿最不可靠的指标。在宏观点数法中,肺泡管肺气肿病例存在过度诊断和诊断不足的情况。因此建议,对于肺泡管肺气肿病例、看似正常的肺部或可进行全面肺功能检查的情况,应开展定量组织学研究。在其他情况下,可以根据宏观测定的肺气肿百分比得出I.S.A.和I.S.A.3000,而无需借助组织学方法。