Suppr超能文献

退行性疾病二尖瓣修复的耐久性

Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease.

作者信息

Gillinov A M, Cosgrove D M, Blackstone E H, Diaz R, Arnold J H, Lytle B W, Smedira N G, Sabik J F, McCarthy P M, Loop F D

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Nov;116(5):734-43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(98)00450-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Degenerative mitral valve disease is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation in the United States. Mitral valve repair is applicable in the majority of these patients and has become the procedure of choice.

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to identify factors influencing the durability of mitral valve repair.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1985 and 1997, 1072 patients underwent primary isolated mitral valve repair for valvular regurgitation caused by degenerative disease. Repair durability was assessed by multivariable risk factor analysis of reoperation. It was supplemented by a search for valve-related risk factors for death before reoperation. Three hospital deaths occurred (0.3%); complete follow-up (4152 patient-years) was available in 1062 of 1069 hospital survivors (99.3%).

RESULTS

At 10 years, freedom from reoperation was 93%. Among 30 patients who required reoperation for late mitral valve dysfunction, the repair failed in 16 (53%) as a result of progressive degenerative disease. Durability of repair was adversely affected by pathologic conditions other than posterior leaflet prolapse, use of chordal shortening, annuloplasty alone, and posterior leaflet resection without annuloplasty. Durability was greatest after quadrangular resection and annuloplasty for posterior leaflet prolapse and was enhanced by the use of intraoperative echocardiography. Death before reoperation was increased in patients having isolated anterior leaflet prolapse or valvular calcification and by use of chordal shortening or annuloplasty alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Repair durability is greatest in patients with isolated posterior leaflet prolapse who have posterior leaflet resection and annuloplasty. Chordal shortening, annuloplasty alone, and leaflet resection without annuloplasty jeopardize late results.

摘要

背景

在美国,退行性二尖瓣疾病是二尖瓣反流最常见的病因。二尖瓣修复适用于大多数此类患者,且已成为首选术式。

目的

本研究旨在确定影响二尖瓣修复耐久性的因素。

患者与方法

1985年至1997年间,1072例患者因退行性疾病导致的瓣膜反流接受了初次单纯二尖瓣修复术。通过再次手术的多变量危险因素分析评估修复的耐久性。通过查找再次手术前与瓣膜相关的死亡危险因素进行补充。发生了3例院内死亡(0.3%);1069例院内幸存者中的1062例(99.3%)获得了完整随访(4152患者年)。

结果

10年时,再次手术的自由度为93%。在30例因晚期二尖瓣功能障碍需要再次手术的患者中,16例(53%)因进行性退行性疾病导致修复失败。除后叶脱垂、使用腱索缩短、单纯瓣环成形术以及未行瓣环成形术的后叶切除之外的病理状况对修复的耐久性产生不利影响。后叶脱垂行四边形切除和瓣环成形术后耐久性最佳,术中超声心动图的使用可增强耐久性。孤立性前叶脱垂或瓣膜钙化患者以及使用腱索缩短或单纯瓣环成形术会增加再次手术前的死亡风险。

结论

孤立性后叶脱垂且行后叶切除和瓣环成形术的患者修复耐久性最佳。腱索缩短、单纯瓣环成形术以及未行瓣环成形术的瓣叶切除会危及远期效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验