Weber F, Keppel F, Georgopoulos C, Hayer-Hartl M K, Hartl F U
Max-Planck-Institut für Biochemie, Martinsried, Germany.
Nat Struct Biol. 1998 Nov;5(11):977-85. doi: 10.1038/2952.
Two models are being considered for the mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding in E. coli: (i) GroEL/GroES act primarily by enclosing substrate polypeptide in a folding cage in which aggregation is prevented during folding. (ii) GroEL mediates the repetitive unfolding of misfolded polypeptides, returning them onto a productive folding track. Both models are not mutually exclusive, but studies with the polypeptide-binding domain of GroEL have suggested that unfolding is the primary mechanism, enclosure being unnecessary. Here we investigate the capacity of the isolated apical polypeptide-binding domain to functionally replace the complete GroEL/GroES system. We show that the apical domain binds aggregation-sensitive polypeptides but cannot significantly assist their refolding in vitro and fails to replace the groEL gene or to complement defects of groEL mutants in vivo. A single-ring version of GroEL cannot substitute for GroEL. These results strongly support the view that sequestration of aggregation-prone intermediates in a folding cage is an important element of the chaperonin mechanism.
(i)GroEL/GroES主要通过将底物多肽封闭在一个折叠笼中来发挥作用,在折叠过程中防止聚集。(ii)GroEL介导错误折叠多肽的重复解折叠,使其回到有效的折叠轨道上。这两种模型并非相互排斥,但对GroEL多肽结合结构域的研究表明,解折叠是主要机制,封闭并非必需。在这里,我们研究了分离的顶端多肽结合结构域在功能上替代完整的GroEL/GroES系统的能力。我们发现顶端结构域能结合对聚集敏感的多肽,但在体外不能显著辅助它们重新折叠,并且在体内无法替代groEL基因或弥补groEL突变体的缺陷。单环形式的GroEL不能替代GroEL。这些结果有力地支持了这样一种观点,即在折叠笼中隔离易于聚集的中间体是伴侣蛋白机制的一个重要元素。