Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein V A, Subak L, Scheidler J, Segal M, Brand R, Grady D
San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Radiology, University of California, 94115, USA.
JAMA. 1998 Nov 4;280(17):1510-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.17.1510.
Postmenopausal vaginal bleeding is a common clinical problem. Endovaginal ultrasound (EVUS) is a noninvasive diagnostic test that may help determine which women should undergo endometrial biopsy.
To determine the accuracy of EVUS in detecting endometrial disease in postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding according to hormone replacement use.
Literature search of English-language and non-English-language articles published from 1966 through November 1996 using MEDLINE and by a manual search of bibliographies of published articles.
Studies were included if they prospectively collected EVUS measurements of endometrial thickness prior to obtaining endometrial tissue for histologic evaluation in postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding. Of 85 studies that included data on EVUS and endometrial histology, 35 were included in the meta-analysis and included 5892 women.
Articles were reviewed and independently selected and abstracted by 2 reviewers. Disagreement was resolved by consensus.
The overall summary mean weighted estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated for thresholds of endometrial thickness from 3 to 10 mm. Using a 5-mm threshold to define abnormal endometrial thickening, 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94%-98%) of women with cancer had an abnormal EVUS result, whereas 92% (95% CI, 90%-93%) of women with endometrial disease (cancer, polyp, or atypical hyperplasia) had an abnormal result. This did not vary by hormone replacement use. However, the number of women with normal histology who had an abnormal EVUS result did vary by hormone replacement use. In women who were not using hormone replacement therapy, 593 (8%) with normal histological findings had an abnormal EVUS result (specificity, 92%; 95% CI, 90%-94%), whereas 1544 (23%) using hormone replacement therapy had an abnormal EVUS result (specificity, 77%; 95% CI, 75%-79%). For a postmenopausal woman with vaginal bleeding with a 10% pretest probability of endometrial cancer, her probability of cancer is 1% following a normal EVUS result.
Endovaginal ultrasound has a high sensitivity for detecting endometrial cancer and other endometrial disease and can reliably identify postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding who are highly unlikely to have significant endometrial disease so that endometrial sampling may be unnecessary.
绝经后阴道出血是一个常见的临床问题。经阴道超声检查(EVUS)是一种非侵入性诊断测试,可帮助确定哪些女性应接受子宫内膜活检。
根据激素替代疗法的使用情况,确定经阴道超声检查(EVUS)在检测绝经后阴道出血女性子宫内膜疾病中的准确性。
使用MEDLINE对1966年至1996年11月发表的英文和非英文文章进行文献检索,并通过手工检索已发表文章的参考文献。
如果研究前瞻性地收集了绝经后阴道出血女性在获取子宫内膜组织进行组织学评估之前的经阴道超声检查(EVUS)子宫内膜厚度测量值,则纳入研究。在85项包含经阴道超声检查(EVUS)和子宫内膜组织学数据的研究中,35项纳入荟萃分析,共纳入5892名女性。
由2名审阅者对文章进行审阅、独立选择和摘要。分歧通过协商解决。
计算子宫内膜厚度阈值为3至10毫米时敏感性和特异性的总体汇总平均加权估计值。使用5毫米阈值定义子宫内膜增厚异常,96%(95%置信区间[CI],94%-98%)的癌症女性经阴道超声检查(EVUS)结果异常,而92%(95%CI,90%-93%)的子宫内膜疾病(癌症、息肉或非典型增生)女性结果异常。这并不因激素替代疗法的使用情况而有所不同。然而,经阴道超声检查(EVUS)结果异常但组织学正常的女性数量确实因激素替代疗法的使用情况而有所不同。在未使用激素替代疗法的女性中,593名(8%)组织学结果正常但经阴道超声检查(EVUS)结果异常(特异性,92%;95%CI,90%-94%),而1544名(23%)使用激素替代疗法的女性经阴道超声检查(EVUS)结果异常(特异性,77%;95%CI,75%-79%)。对于一名绝经后阴道出血且子宫内膜癌预测试验概率为10%的女性,经阴道超声检查(EVUS)结果正常后其患癌概率为1%。
经阴道超声检查(EVUS)对检测子宫内膜癌和其他子宫内膜疾病具有高敏感性,并且可以可靠地识别绝经后阴道出血且极不可能患有严重子宫内膜疾病的女性,从而可能无需进行子宫内膜取样。