Beaufils M, Clément D L
Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.
Drugs. 1998;56 Suppl 2:11-21. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856002-00002.
The aim of the treatment of hypertensive disease is to reduce its associated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Simply reducing blood pressure levels is clearly not adequate since its impact on coronary heart disease is particularly unsatisfactory. Moreover, the beneficial effects of antihypertensive treatment seem to plateau for several years, and the incidence of cardiac and renal failure is even increasing. Therefore, recommendations by groups of national or international experts are periodically updated on the basis of current epidemiological data. Two such recommendations appeared in 1997, one from the Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé (ANAES) in France and the other from the Joint National Committee (JNC) on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, in the United States. Both advocate the use of lifestyle modifications in all patients. The threshold blood pressure level at which pharmacological therapy is introduced largely depends on associated cardiovascular risk factors and/or involvement of target organs. The JNC recommends a particularly low threshold in patients with diabetes. Pharmacological treatment is usually initiated with a single drug. The choice of any one drug depends on the patient profile and takes into consideration such characteristics as age and associated risk factors or comorbidity. Some represent a contraindication for certain therapeutic classes (for example, asthma for beta-blockers, renovascular hypertension for ACE inhibitors), while others are a specific or even 'compelling' indication (heart failure, angina, renal disease, peripheral vascular disease etc.). This patient profiling is very precisely described in the new recommendations. However, any such single drug therapy provides adequate blood pressure control in no more than about 50 to 60% of patients. When the patient does not respond to the drug used or experiences side effects, substitution of a drug from another pharmacological class is recommended. In contrast, if the patient is a responder but blood pressure remains above the target level, it is preferable to add a second drug from a class offering complementary action. The use of a combination therapy allows blood pressure control in more than 80% of patients. More authors are suggesting that combination therapy as first-line treatment may increase the number of responders and reduce the impact of counter-regulatory effects occurring with single drug therapy (e.g. sodium retention, or sympathetic activation). This alternative strategy is now acknowledged in the recommendations.
高血压疾病治疗的目的是降低其相关的心血管发病率和死亡率。仅仅降低血压水平显然是不够的,因为其对冠心病的影响尤其不尽人意。此外,抗高血压治疗的有益效果似乎在数年内趋于平稳,而心力衰竭和肾衰竭的发病率甚至还在上升。因此,国家或国际专家小组的建议会根据当前的流行病学数据定期更新。1997年出现了两项这样的建议,一项来自法国的国家卫生认证与评估机构(ANAES),另一项来自美国预防、检测、评估与治疗高血压联合委员会(JNC)。两者都提倡在所有患者中采用生活方式的改变。开始药物治疗的血压阈值很大程度上取决于相关的心血管危险因素和/或靶器官受累情况。JNC建议糖尿病患者的阈值特别低。药物治疗通常从单一药物开始。任何一种药物的选择都取决于患者的情况,并考虑年龄和相关危险因素或合并症等特征。有些情况是某些治疗类别(如哮喘患者禁用β受体阻滞剂,肾血管性高血压患者禁用ACE抑制剂)的禁忌证,而其他情况则是特定的甚至是“强制性”适应证(心力衰竭、心绞痛、肾脏疾病、外周血管疾病等)。新建议中对这种患者情况描述得非常精确。然而,任何这种单一药物治疗在不超过约50%至60%的患者中能提供充分的血压控制。当患者对所用药物无反应或出现副作用时,建议换用另一类别的药物。相反,如果患者有反应但血压仍高于目标水平,最好加用一种具有互补作用的另一类别的第二种药物。联合治疗可使80%以上的患者血压得到控制。越来越多的作者认为,联合治疗作为一线治疗可能会增加有反应的患者数量,并减少单一药物治疗时出现的反调节作用(如钠潴留或交感神经激活)的影响。这种替代策略现在已在建议中得到认可。