• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用铸造桩核或碳纤维桩与复合树脂核修复的无髓牙抗折性能比较。

Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core.

作者信息

Martínez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U

机构信息

School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, Santiago de Compostela University, Spain.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Nov;80(5):527-32. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70027-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70027-7
PMID:9813801
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The survival of pulpless teeth restored with a post and core system is a controversial issue.

PURPOSE

This study compared the fracture resistance of 2 types of restorations: teeth restored with prefabricated carbon-fiber posts and composite cores to cast dowel-core restored teeth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 44 recently extracted sound premolars were randomly distributed into 2 equal groups: group I, restored with prefabricated carbon-fiber post and a composite core; and group II, with custom-cast type III gold alloy post and cores. The size and shape of the posts were identical in the 2 groups. All teeth were fully covered with a nonprecious cast crown. Fracture resistance was measured by applying a point force at 45 degrees to the long angle of the tooth.

RESULTS

Mean fracture threshold was 103.7 +/- 53.1 kg for group I versus 202.7 +/- 125.0 kg for group II (differences significant with P = .003). In group II, however, fracture nearly always affected the tooth itself, whereas in group I, the post-core nearly always failed first.

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly higher fracture thresholds were recorded for the cast post and core group. Teeth restored with cast posts typically showed fracture of the tooth, although at loads rarely occurring clinically.

摘要

问题陈述

采用桩核系统修复的无髓牙的存活率是一个存在争议的问题。

目的

本研究比较了两种修复体的抗折性:用预制碳纤维桩和复合树脂核修复的牙齿与铸造桩核修复的牙齿。

材料与方法

总共44颗近期拔除的健康前磨牙被随机分为两组,每组数量相等:第一组用预制碳纤维桩和复合树脂核修复;第二组用定制铸造的Ⅲ型金合金桩和核修复。两组桩的尺寸和形状相同。所有牙齿均用非贵金属铸造全冠修复。通过在与牙齿长轴呈45度角的方向施加集中载荷来测量抗折性。

结果

第一组的平均折裂阈值为103.7±53.1千克,而第二组为202.7±125.0千克(差异显著,P = 0.003)。然而,在第二组中,折裂几乎总是发生在牙齿本身,而在第一组中,桩核几乎总是先发生折断。

结论

铸造桩核组的折裂阈值显著更高。用铸造桩修复的牙齿通常表现为牙齿折裂,尽管在临床上很少出现这种载荷情况。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core.采用铸造桩核或碳纤维桩与复合树脂核修复的无髓牙抗折性能比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Nov;80(5):527-32. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70027-7.
2
Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns.采用桩核与冠修复的无髓牙的抗折性。
Dent Mater. 2006 May;22(5):477-85. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.017. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
3
In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.上颌切牙结构受损牙根中根管桩的体外比较
SADJ. 2011 Jun;66(5):220-3.
4
An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence ofvertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-coresystems.一项关于用六种桩核系统修复的无髓牙的抗折性及垂直根折发生率的体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Mar;81(3):262-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70267-2.
5
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber posts of different lengths.不同长度玻璃纤维桩修复后根管治疗牙的抗折性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jan;111(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
6
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.三种黏固剂黏固的玻璃纤维增强桩核和铸造金桩核修复的根管治疗后牙的抗折性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Aug;110(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60352-2.
7
Static and fatigue fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores.采用桩核修复的无髓牙的静态和疲劳抗折性
Dent Mater. 2008 Sep;24(9):1178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
8
[Comparison of fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with fiber reinforced composite posts and three kinds of resin core material].[纤维增强复合桩与三种树脂核材料修复无髓牙的抗折性能比较]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Oct;22(5):404-5, 414.
9
Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems.使用不同桩核系统修复的根管治疗牙齿在动态加载后的断裂强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Apr;87(4):438-45. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.123849.
10
Effect of core stiffness on the in vitro fracture of crowned, endodontically treated teeth.髓腔刚度对根管治疗后冠修复牙体外骨折的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Sep;88(3):302-6. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.127909.

引用本文的文献

1
Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM tooth-colored versus cast metal post-and-core restorations in root filled teeth: An in vitro study.根管充填后牙齿中CAD/CAM全瓷桩核与铸造金属桩核修复体的抗折性能:一项体外研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Sep;36(9):1215-1220. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.07.002. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
2
Is a Pre-Existent Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Able to Detect Metal Dental Posts?术前锥形束计算机断层扫描能否检测出金属牙桩?
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;12(7):229. doi: 10.3390/dj12070229.
3
Fracture Resistance of Different Post-Core Systems: An Study.
不同桩核系统的抗折性:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S239-S243. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_472_22. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
4
Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars reinforced by customized glass fiber post in two different ways: An study.两种不同方式定制玻璃纤维桩增强根管治疗后上颌前磨牙抗折性的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;25(5):555-560. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_270_22. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
5
Effect of Surface Treatments of Polyetherketoneketone as a Post Material on Shear Bond Strength to Root Dentin using Two Types of Resin Cement.聚醚醚酮酮后材料表面处理对两种树脂水门汀与牙本质剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2022 Nov 28;24:435-443. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b3608791.
6
An In Vitro Study Comparing the Diametral Tensile Strength of Composite Core Build-Up Material With Three Different Prefabricated Post Systems.一项体外研究:比较复合树脂核桩修复材料与三种不同预成桩系统的直径拉伸强度
Cureus. 2022 Sep 25;14(9):e29560. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29560. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Comparison of fiber-reinforced composite and nanohybrid resin impregnated with glass fibers as postendodontic restoration in molars - A clinical study.纤维增强复合材料与玻璃纤维浸渍纳米混合树脂作为磨牙根管治疗后修复材料的比较——一项临床研究
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Sep-Oct;24(5):514-518. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_147_21. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
8
Impact of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core material.不同表面处理方法对纤维桩与复合树脂核材料之间粘结强度的影响。
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Sep;33(6):334-341. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Effect of photo core, LuxaCore, and core max II core building materials on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and ParaPosts.光固化桩核、LuxaCore桩核以及Core Max II桩核材料对采用纤维增强复合桩和ParaPost修复的根管治疗后牙齿抗折性能的影响
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Aug 14;17(4):244-250. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
10
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems: An Study.不同桩系统修复的根管治疗前牙的抗折性能:一项研究。
Eur Endod J. 2018 Sep 7;3(3):174-178. doi: 10.14744/eej.2018.70299. eCollection 2018.