• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多周期大剂量化疗和非格司亭动员的外周血祖细胞对高危乳腺癌进行辅助治疗。

Adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer using multicycle high-dose chemotherapy and filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells.

作者信息

Basser R L, To L B, Begley C G, Juttner C A, Maher D W, Szer J, Cebon J, Collins J P, Russell I, Olver I

机构信息

Centre for Developmental Therapeutics-affiliates: Melbourne Tumor Biology Branch, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Department of Medical Oncology,Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 1995 Jul;1(7):715-21.

PMID:9816037
Abstract

Women with primary breast cancer associated with extensive axillary node involvement or large primary tumors have a very poor prognosis despite treatment with standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy. In an attempt to improve the outlook of these patients, we investigated the safety and feasibility of delivering three cycles of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide supported with filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). Fifteen previously untreated women, median age 50 (range, 30-58) years, with poor prognosis early stage breast cancer received filgrastim (12 microgram/kg daily for 6 days) prior to chemotherapy to mobilize progenitor cells. Patients were then given three cycles of epirubicin (200 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) at planned 28-day intervals, each followed by infusion of one third of the PBPC collected and daily administration of filgrastim (5 microgram/kg s.c.). Three leukaphereses collected a median of 114.9 (range, 22.7-273.5) x 10(4) granulocyte-macrophage-colony-forming cells/kg body weight. Hemopoietic recovery was rapid after each cycle, and there was no correlation between the rate of recovery and the number of granulocyte-macrophage-colony-forming cells infused. There was a small but significant progressive delay in recovery from hematological and nonhematological toxicities across the three cycles. Left ventricular ejection fraction fell to below 50% in eight (53%) patients, but none developed congestive cardiac failure. Two patients did not complete three cycles because of insufficient PBPC for a third cycle (n = 1) and 2-mercaptoethane sodium sulfonate- related drug reaction during the second cycle (n = 1). There were no deaths during the study or during the follow-up period (median, 70 weeks; range, 50-85 weeks), and no late toxicities occurred. Therefore, we concluded that the delivery of multiple cycles of nonmyeloablative, dose-intensive chemotherapy supported by PBPC and filgrastim is safe, and may be widely applicable to a variety of common chemosensitive cancers with a poor prognosis. The efficacy of three cycles of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide is to be compared with standard-dose chemotherapy in a randomized trial in patients with high-risk, operable stage II and III breast cancer.

摘要

尽管接受了标准剂量的辅助化疗,但伴有广泛腋窝淋巴结受累或原发性肿瘤较大的原发性乳腺癌女性预后很差。为了改善这些患者的预后,我们研究了给予三个周期的高剂量表柔比星和环磷酰胺,并辅以非格司亭动员的外周血祖细胞(PBPC)的安全性和可行性。15名先前未接受过治疗、年龄中位数为50岁(范围30 - 58岁)、预后不良的早期乳腺癌女性在化疗前接受非格司亭(每日12微克/千克,共6天)以动员祖细胞。然后患者每28天接受三个周期的表柔比星(200毫克/平方米)和环磷酰胺(4克/平方米)治疗,每个周期后输注所采集PBPC的三分之一,并每日皮下注射非格司亭(5微克/千克)。三次白细胞分离术采集的粒细胞 - 巨噬细胞集落形成细胞中位数为114.9(范围22.7 - 273.5)×10⁴/千克体重。每个周期后造血恢复迅速,恢复速率与输注的粒细胞 - 巨噬细胞集落形成细胞数量之间无相关性。在三个周期中,血液学和非血液学毒性的恢复出现了轻微但显著的逐渐延迟。八名(53%)患者的左心室射血分数降至50%以下,但无一例发生充血性心力衰竭。两名患者未完成三个周期,原因分别是第三个周期的PBPC不足(n = 1)以及第二个周期出现与2 - 巯基乙烷磺酸钠相关的药物反应(n = 1)。研究期间及随访期(中位数70周;范围50 - 85周)均无死亡病例,也未出现晚期毒性反应。因此,我们得出结论,由PBPC和非格司亭支持的多个周期非清髓性、剂量密集化疗是安全的,可能广泛适用于各种预后不良的常见化疗敏感性癌症。在一项针对高危、可手术的II期和III期乳腺癌患者的随机试验中,将比较三个周期高剂量表柔比星和环磷酰胺与标准剂量化疗的疗效。

相似文献

1
Adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer using multicycle high-dose chemotherapy and filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells.使用多周期大剂量化疗和非格司亭动员的外周血祖细胞对高危乳腺癌进行辅助治疗。
Clin Cancer Res. 1995 Jul;1(7):715-21.
2
Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) through a combination of chemotherapy and G-CSF in breast cancer patients and a possibility of unprocessed whole blood collection.通过化疗和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)联合动员乳腺癌患者外周血祖细胞(PBPC)以及未处理全血采集的可能性。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Jan;21(2):123-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701058.
3
The increase of the rate of hemopoietic recovery and clinical benefit of the erythropoietin (EPO) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) after intensive cyclic chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients.高危乳腺癌患者在强化周期化疗后,促红细胞生成素(EPO)和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)联合外周血祖细胞(PBPC)可提高造血恢复率并带来临床益处。
Neoplasma. 1999;46(3):166-72.
4
Conventional adjuvant chemotherapy versus single-cycle, autograft-supported, high-dose, late-intensification chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: a randomized trial.高危乳腺癌患者中传统辅助化疗与单周期、自体移植支持的大剂量晚期强化化疗的随机试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jul 21;96(14):1076-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh188.
5
A feasibility study of multiple cycle therapy with melphalan, thiotepa, and paclitaxel followed by mitoxantrone, thiotepa, and paclitaxel with autologous hematopoietic cell support for metastatic breast cancer.美法仑、噻替派和紫杉醇多周期治疗后序贯米托蒽醌、噻替派和紫杉醇并采用自体造血细胞支持治疗转移性乳腺癌的可行性研究
Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Nov;5(11):3411-8.
6
Multicycle dose-intensive chemotherapy for women with high-risk primary breast cancer: results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 15-95.高危原发性乳腺癌女性的多周期剂量密集化疗:国际乳腺癌研究组15-95试验结果
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):370-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.5196.
7
Simultaneous dose escalation and schedule intensification of carboplatin-based chemotherapy using peripheral blood progenitor cells and filgrastim: a phase I trial.使用外周血祖细胞和非格司亭同步进行卡铂化疗的剂量递增和方案强化:一项I期试验
Cancer Res. 1994 Dec 1;54(23):6137-42.
8
Phase I/II study of dose-intense doxorubicin/paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide with peripheral blood progenitor cells and cytokine support in patients with metastatic breast cancer.转移性乳腺癌患者接受剂量密集型阿霉素/紫杉醇/环磷酰胺联合外周血祖细胞及细胞因子支持的I/II期研究。
Semin Oncol. 1997 Oct;24(5 Suppl 17):S17-77-S17-80.
9
Efficacy and toxicity of sequential high-dose therapy with peripheral blood stem cell support in patients with high-risk breast cancer.
Semin Oncol. 1998 Apr;25(2 Suppl 4):7-11; discussion 45-8.
10
Stage III and oestrogen receptor negativity are associated with poor prognosis after adjuvant high-dose therapy in high-risk breast cancer.在高危乳腺癌患者中,Ⅲ期及雌激素受体阴性与辅助性高剂量治疗后的预后不良相关。
Br J Cancer. 1999 Mar;79(9-10):1500-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690239.

引用本文的文献

1
Can sequential administration minimise the cost of high dose chemotherapy? An economic assessment in inflammatory breast cancer.序贯给药能否将高剂量化疗的成本降至最低?炎性乳腺癌的经济学评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(11):807-18. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321110-00004.
2
Treatment of breast cancer with chemotherapy in combination with filgrastim: approaches to improving therapeutic outcome.乳腺癌化疗联合非格司亭治疗:改善治疗效果的方法。
Drugs. 2002;62 Suppl 1:17-31. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262001-00002.
3
A phase I/II study of 4 monthly courses of high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa for metastatic breast cancer patients.
一项针对转移性乳腺癌患者进行的大剂量环磷酰胺和噻替派每4个月疗程的I/II期研究。
Br J Cancer. 2002 Nov 4;87(10):1079-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600631.
4
First-line high-dose sequential chemotherapy with rG-CSF and repeated blood stem cell transplantation in untreated inflammatory breast cancer: toxicity and response (PEGASE 02 trial).一线大剂量序贯化疗联合重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(rG-CSF)及重复血液干细胞移植治疗未经治疗的炎性乳腺癌:毒性与反应(PEGASE 02试验)
Br J Cancer. 1999 Oct;81(3):449-56. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690714.
5
Epirubicin. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of breast cancer.表柔比星。关于其药效学和药代动力学特性以及在乳腺癌治疗中疗效的最新综述。
Drugs. 1997 Mar;53(3):453-82. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753030-00008.
6
A risk-benefit assessment of anthracycline antibiotics in antineoplastic therapy.蒽环类抗生素在抗肿瘤治疗中的风险效益评估。
Drug Saf. 1996 Dec;15(6):406-29. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615060-00005.