Ware J E, Gandek B, Kosinski M, Aaronson N K, Apolone G, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplège A, Prieto L, Sullivan M, Thunedborg K
Health Assessment Lab at the Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1167-70. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00108-5.
Data from general population surveys (n = 1771 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to test the algorithms used to score physical and mental component summary measures (PCS-36/MCS-36) based on the SF-36 Health Survey. Scoring coefficients for principal components were estimated independently in each country using identical methods of factor extraction and orthogonal rotation. PCS-36 and MCS-36 scores were also estimated using standard (U.S.-derived) scoring algorithms, and results were compared. Product-moment correlations between scores estimated from standard and country-specific scoring coefficients were very high (0.98 to 1.00) for both physical and mental health components in all countries. As hypothesized for orthogonal components, correlations between physical and mental components within each country were very low (0.00 to 0.12) for both estimation methods. Mean scores for PCS-36 differed by as much as 3.0 points across countries using standard scoring, and mean scores for MCS-36 differed across countries by as much as 6.4 points. In view of the high degree of equivalence observed within each country, using standard and country-specific algorithms, we recommend use of standard scoring algorithms for purposes of multinational studies involving these 10 countries.
对来自九个欧洲国家(丹麦、法国、德国、意大利、荷兰、挪威、西班牙、瑞典和英国)的一般人群调查数据(n = 1771至9151)进行了分析,以测试基于SF - 36健康调查对身体和心理成分汇总测量(PCS - 36/MCS - 36)进行评分的算法。在每个国家,使用相同的因子提取和正交旋转方法独立估计主成分的评分系数。还使用标准(美国衍生)评分算法估计了PCS - 36和MCS - 36分数,并对结果进行了比较。在所有国家,标准评分系数和特定国家评分系数估计的分数之间的积差相关性在身体和心理健康成分方面都非常高(0.98至1.00)。正如对正交成分所假设的那样,两种估计方法在每个国家内身体和心理成分之间的相关性都非常低(0.00至0.12)。使用标准评分时,各国PCS - 36的平均分数差异高达3.0分,MCS - 36的平均分数在各国之间差异高达6.4分。鉴于在每个国家内使用标准算法和特定国家算法观察到的高度等效性,我们建议在涉及这10个国家的跨国研究中使用标准评分算法。