• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部整形生物植入物上细菌生物膜形成的体内分析。

In vivo analysis of bacterial biofilm formation on facial plastic bioimplants.

作者信息

Malaisrie S C, Malekzadeh S, Biedlingmaier J F

机构信息

University of Maryland Medical School, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 1998 Nov;108(11 Pt 1):1733-8. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199811000-00026.

DOI:10.1097/00005537-199811000-00026
PMID:9818835
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examines the formation of biofilm on biomaterials commonly used in facial plastics and reconstruction including titanium, silicone, ion-bombarded silicone (Ultrasil), e-PTFE (Gore-Tex), e-PTFE with silver/chlorhexidine (Gore-Tex Plus), and PHDPE (Medpor).

METHODS

These biomaterials were implanted subcutaneously in the dorsum of 11 guinea pigs after contamination with Staphylococcus aureus and examined with scanning electron microscopy after 7 days. Wounds were also inspected for infection and extrusion rates.

RESULTS

Results show biofilm formation on titanium, silicone, ion-bombarded silicone, e-PTFE, and PHDPE associated with high rates of extrusion and infection. Implants of e-PTFE with silver/chlorhexidine, on the other hand, appeared resistant to biofilm formation and demonstrated significantly lower rates of extrusion and infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Contamination of bioimplants in vivo leads to formation of bacterial biofilm on the surface of the biomaterial, causing infection, pus formation, and extrusion. The authors hypothesize that the antiseptic agents impregnated in the biomaterial form a protective coat of silver, chlorhexidine, and inflammatory cells that inhibits initial bacterial adhesion to the biomaterial surface.

摘要

目的

本研究考察面部整形与重建常用生物材料上生物膜的形成情况,这些材料包括钛、硅酮、离子轰击硅酮(Ultrasil)、e - 聚四氟乙烯(Gore - Tex)、含银/氯己定的e - 聚四氟乙烯(Gore - Tex Plus)以及聚羟基癸酸酯(Medpor)。

方法

将这些生物材料在被金黄色葡萄球菌污染后皮下植入11只豚鼠的背部,7天后用扫描电子显微镜检查。同时检查伤口的感染情况和材料挤出率。

结果

结果显示,钛、硅酮、离子轰击硅酮、e - 聚四氟乙烯和聚羟基癸酸酯上形成了生物膜,且伴有高挤出率和感染率。另一方面,含银/氯己定的e - 聚四氟乙烯植入物似乎能抵抗生物膜形成,且其挤出率和感染率显著较低。

结论

体内生物植入物污染会导致生物材料表面形成细菌生物膜,引发感染、脓液形成和材料挤出。作者推测,生物材料中浸渍的抗菌剂形成了一层由银、氯己定和炎性细胞组成的保护膜,可抑制细菌最初黏附于生物材料表面。

相似文献

1
In vivo analysis of bacterial biofilm formation on facial plastic bioimplants.面部整形生物植入物上细菌生物膜形成的体内分析。
Laryngoscope. 1998 Nov;108(11 Pt 1):1733-8. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199811000-00026.
2
Clinical and histologic response of subcutaneous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) and porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor) implants to acute and early infection.皮下扩张聚四氟乙烯(戈尔泰克斯)和多孔高密度聚乙烯(Medpor)植入物对急性和早期感染的临床及组织学反应。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Mar;123(3):328-36. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900030110014.
3
In vivo resistance to bacterial biofilm formation on tympanostomy tubes as a function of tube material.鼓膜造孔管上细菌生物膜形成的体内抗性与管材的关系。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 May;120(5):621-7. doi: 10.1053/hn.1999.v120.a94162.
4
Analysis of Facial Implants for Bacterial Biofilm Formation Using Scanning Electron Microscopy.利用扫描电子显微镜分析面部植入物中细菌生物膜的形成。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Jul 1;18(4):299-304. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.0279.
5
Biofilm formation on coated silicone tympanostomy tubes.硅胶鼓膜置管上生物膜的形成
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Feb;77(2):223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.10.027. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
6
A chlorhexidine-releasing epoxy-based coating on titanium implants prevents Staphylococcus aureus experimental biomaterial-associated infection.钛植入物上的一种释放洗必泰的环氧基涂层可预防金黄色葡萄球菌实验性生物材料相关感染。
Eur Cell Mater. 2017 Feb 14;33:143-157. doi: 10.22203/eCM.v033a11.
7
Effect of ion-bombarded silicone tympanostomy tube on ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation.离子轰击硅胶鼓膜造孔管对耐环丙沙星铜绿假单胞菌生物膜形成的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;76(10):1471-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.06.025. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
8
An evaluation of the effectiveness of different techniques for intraoperative infiltration of antibiotics into alloplastic implants for use in facial reconstruction.评估用于面部重建的异体植入物术中抗生素浸润不同技术的有效性。
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;11(4):246-51. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2009.45.
9
Medical-Grade Silicone Coated with Rhamnolipid R89 Is Effective against spp. Biofilms.载有鼠李糖脂 R89 的医用级硅胶可有效对抗 生物膜。
Molecules. 2019 Oct 25;24(21):3843. doi: 10.3390/molecules24213843.
10
Immobilization-Enhanced Eradication of Bacterial Biofilms and in situ Antimicrobial Coating of Implant Material Surface - an in vitro Study.固定增强法消除细菌生物膜和原位抗菌涂层在植入材料表面的应用——一项体外研究。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2019 Nov 29;14:9351-9360. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S219487. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of Chronic Sphenoid Sinusitis After Sellar Reconstruction with Medpor Porous Polyethylene Implant.使用Medpor多孔聚乙烯植入物进行鞍区重建后慢性蝶窦炎的发生
World Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;123:e781-e786. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.034. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
2
Treatment of Infected Facial Implants.感染面部植入物的治疗
Semin Plast Surg. 2016 May;30(2):78-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580727.
3
In vitro antimicrobial properties of silver-polysaccharide coatings on porous fiber-reinforced composites for bone implants.用于骨植入物的多孔纤维增强复合材料上银-多糖涂层的体外抗菌性能
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013 Dec;24(12):2775-85. doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-5022-2. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
4
Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing.运用焦磷酸测序、变性梯度凝胶电泳和全核糖体鸟枪法测序对慢性伤口中的细菌多样性进行调查。
BMC Microbiol. 2008 Mar 6;8:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-43.
5
Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair.用于腹疝修补的四种生物假体的实验评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Oct;11(10):1275-85. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0242-8. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
6
In vitro infectability of prosthetic mesh by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对人工合成补片的体外感染性
Hernia. 2006 Apr;10(2):120-4. doi: 10.1007/s10029-005-0056-0. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
7
The susceptibility of prosthetic biomaterials to infection.人工生物材料的感染易感性。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Mar;19(3):430-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8810-4. Epub 2004 Dec 9.