Suppr超能文献

肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者延髓肌肉的针极肌电图检查:亚临床受累的证据

Needle electromyography of bulbar muscles in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: evidence of subclinical involvement.

作者信息

Finsterer J, Erdorf M, Mamoli B, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A

机构信息

Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Epilepsy and Neuromuscular Disorders, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Neurology. 1998 Nov;51(5):1417-22. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.5.1417.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if quantitative motor unit action potential (MUAP) analysis and peak ratio interference pattern analysis of the fifth, seventh, and eleventh cranial nerve innervated muscles are helpful in the assessment of subclinical bulbar involvement in ALS.

METHODS

With both electromyographic (EMG) techniques, electrical activity was recorded via needle electrodes from the right frontalis, masseter, and sternocleidomastoideus muscles of nine ALS patients without clinical bulbar signs (Frenchay score >85%) aged 40 to 87 years; 21 healthy subjects aged 27 to 74 years; and five ALS patients with clinical bulbar signs (Frenchay score <85%) aged 53 to 69 years.

RESULTS

The normal mean (2 SD) MUAP duration of the frontalis muscle was 7.4 (2.2) milliseconds; masseter muscle, 9.3 (3.1) milliseconds; and sternocleidomastoideus muscle, 10.9 (4.1) milliseconds. The normal mean (2 SD) peak ratio of the frontalis was 2.3 (1.1) milliseconds; masseter, 1.2 (0.4) milliseconds; and sternocleidomastoideus, 1.5 (0.7) milliseconds. Quantitative MUAP analysis was interpreted as neuropathic if MUAP duration, MUAP amplitude, or both exceeded the mean (+2 SD). Peak ratio interference pattern analysis was interpreted as neuropathic if the peak ratio, the number of small time intervals, or both were below the mean (-2 SD). If a result of either EMG technique was neuropathic in at least one of the three investigated muscles, bulbar involvement was assumed. Subclinical bulbar involvement could be detected by quantitative MUAP analysis in six ALS patients without clinical bulbar signs, and by peak ratio interference pattern analysis in two.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional needle EMG of the fifth, seventh, and eleventh cranial nerve innervated muscles shows subclinical bulbar involvement quite frequently. Peak ratio interference pattern analysis is largely not helpful in detecting this involvement.

摘要

目的

确定对由第五、第七和第十一颅神经支配的肌肉进行运动单位动作电位(MUAP)定量分析和峰值比率干扰图分析,是否有助于评估肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者的亚临床延髓受累情况。

方法

采用两种肌电图(EMG)技术,通过针电极记录9例年龄在40至87岁、无临床延髓体征(Frenchay评分>85%)的ALS患者右侧额肌、咬肌和胸锁乳突肌的电活动;21例年龄在27至74岁的健康受试者;以及5例年龄在53至69岁、有临床延髓体征(Frenchay评分<85%)的ALS患者。

结果

额肌正常平均(2标准差)MUAP时限为7.4(2.2)毫秒;咬肌为9.3(3.1)毫秒;胸锁乳突肌为10.9(4.1)毫秒。额肌正常平均(2标准差)峰值比率为2.3(1.1)毫秒;咬肌为1.2(0.4)毫秒;胸锁乳突肌为1.5(0.7)毫秒。如果MUAP时限、MUAP波幅或两者均超过平均值(+2标准差),则定量MUAP分析被解释为神经源性。如果峰值比率或小时间间隔数量或两者均低于平均值(-2标准差),则峰值比率干扰图分析被解释为神经源性。如果两种EMG技术中的任何一种在三个被研究肌肉中的至少一个出现神经源性结果,则假定存在延髓受累。在6例无临床延髓体征的ALS患者中,通过定量MUAP分析可检测到亚临床延髓受累,2例通过峰值比率干扰图分析检测到。

结论

对第五、第七和第十一颅神经支配肌肉进行常规针电极肌电图检查显示,亚临床延髓受累相当常见。峰值比率干扰图分析在很大程度上无助于检测这种受累情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验