Hylander W L, Ravosa M J, Ross C F, Johnson K R
Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998 Nov;107(3):257-71. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199811)107:3<257::AID-AJPA3>3.0.CO;2-6.
Previous work indicates that compared to adult thick-tailed galagos, adult long-tailed macaques have much more bone strain on the balancing-side mandibular corpus during unilateral isometric molar biting (Hylander [1979a] J. Morphol. 159:253-296). Recently we have confirmed in these same two species the presence of similar differences in bone-strain patterns during forceful mastication. Moreover, we have also recorded mandibular bone strain patterns in adult owl monkeys, which are slightly smaller than the galago subjects. The owl monkey data indicate the presence of a strain pattern very similar to that recorded for macaques, and quite unlike that recorded for galagos. We interpret these bone-strain pattern differences to be importantly related to differences in balancing-side jaw-adductor muscle force recruitment patterns. That is, compared to galagos, macaques and owl monkeys recruit relatively more balancing-side jaw-adductor muscle force during forceful mastication. Unlike an earlier study (Hylander [1979b] J. Morphol. 160:223-240), we are unable to estimate the actual amount of working-side muscle force relative to balancing-side muscle force (i.e., the W/B muscle force ratio) in these species because we have no reliable estimate of magnitude, direction, and precise location of the bite force during mastication. A comparison of the mastication data with the earlier data recorded during isometric molar biting, however, supports the hypothesis that the two anthropoids have a small W/B jaw-adductor muscle force ratio in comparison to thick-tailed galagos. These data also support the hypothesis that increased recruitment of balancing-side jaw-adductor muscle force in anthropoids is functionally linked to the evolution of symphyseal fusion or strengthening. Moreover, these data refute the hypothesis that the recruitment pattern differences between macaques and thick-tailed galagos are due to allometric factors. Finally, although the evolution of symphyseal fusion in primates may be linked to increased stress associated with increased balancing-side muscle force, it is currently unclear as to whether the increased force is predominately vertically directed, transversely directed, or is a near equal combination of these two force components (cf. Ravosa and Hylander [1994] In Fleagle and Kay [eds.]: Anthropoid Origins. New York: Plenum, pp. 447-468).
先前的研究表明,与成年粗尾婴猴相比,成年恒河猴在单侧等长磨牙咬合时,平衡侧下颌体上的骨应变要大得多(海兰德[1979a]《形态学杂志》159:253 - 296)。最近,我们在这两个物种中证实,在强力咀嚼时骨应变模式存在类似差异。此外,我们还记录了成年夜猴的下颌骨应变模式,成年夜猴体型比婴猴略小。夜猴的数据表明其应变模式与恒河猴记录的非常相似,而与婴猴记录的截然不同。我们认为这些骨应变模式差异与平衡侧颌内收肌力量募集模式的差异密切相关。也就是说,与婴猴相比,恒河猴和夜猴在强力咀嚼时募集的平衡侧颌内收肌力量相对更多。与早期研究(海兰德[1979b]《形态学杂志》160:223 - 240)不同,我们无法估算这些物种中工作侧肌肉力量相对于平衡侧肌肉力量的实际大小(即W/B肌肉力量比),因为我们无法可靠地估算咀嚼时咬力的大小、方向和精确位置。然而,将咀嚼数据与早期等长磨牙咬合时记录的数据进行比较,支持了这样一种假设,即与粗尾婴猴相比,这两种类人猿的W/B颌内收肌力量比很小。这些数据还支持了另一种假设,即类人猿中平衡侧颌内收肌力量募集增加在功能上与联合处融合或强化的进化有关。此外,这些数据反驳了恒河猴和粗尾婴猴之间募集模式差异是由于异速生长因素的假设。最后,尽管灵长类动物联合处融合的进化可能与平衡侧肌肉力量增加相关的压力增加有关,但目前尚不清楚增加的力量主要是垂直方向、横向方向,还是这两种力分量的近乎相等的组合(参见拉沃萨和海兰德[1994]《在弗利格尔和凯[编著]:类人猿起源》。纽约:普伦蒂斯出版社,第447 - 468页)。