Suppr超能文献

变态与再生的概念基础:从历史关联到共同机制

Conceptual foundations of metamorphosis and regeneration: from historical links to common mechanisms.

作者信息

Dinsmore C E

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Ill, USA.

出版信息

Wound Repair Regen. 1998 Jul-Aug;6(4):291-301. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1998.60405.x.

Abstract

Metamorphosis and regeneration represent two familiar examples of developmental processes. In Western thought, their conceptual link with broader issues of generation or animal reproduction, including "spontaneous generation," began with the ancient Greeks. Their ideas dominated scientific discourse on these topics until William Harvey, in the mid-17th century, redefined and distinguished between epigenesis and metamorphosis as fundamentally different modes of reproduction. However, preformation theories, formulated in response to perceived threats of epigenetic concepts to religious doctrine, eclipsed epigenesis for much of the 18th century. Abraham Trembley's 1740 discovery of hydra regeneration helped to fuel the "epigenesis-preformation debate" at that time. During that period, an exchange between C.F. Wolff, a young epigenesist, and A. von Haller, the reformed preformationist, saw robust models erected to comprehend generation, metamorphosis, and regeneration under each world view. Subsequent elaboration of experimental zoology and the incremental advance of biological knowledge saw the birth of divergent research traditions in pursuit of specialized problems. Embryology, regeneration, and metamorphosis, like genetics, identified independent study topics and elaborated new techniques, thereby creating their own research trajectories. Conceptual reintegration has slowly emerged with the evolution of current biotechnology. We have now begun to discern common molecular mechanisms underlying and reuniting metamorphosis and regeneration, as revealed in the accompanying symposium papers.

摘要

变态和再生是发育过程中两个为人熟知的例子。在西方思想中,它们与包括“自然发生”在内的更广泛的生殖问题或动物繁殖概念的联系始于古希腊人。他们的观点主导了关于这些主题的科学论述,直到17世纪中叶威廉·哈维重新定义并区分了渐成论和变态,将其视为根本不同的生殖模式。然而,为应对渐成论概念对宗教教义的潜在威胁而形成的预成论在18世纪的大部分时间里使渐成论黯然失色。亚伯拉罕·特朗布雷1740年对水螅再生的发现推动了当时的“渐成论—预成论之争”。在那个时期,年轻的渐成论者C.F.沃尔夫与改革后的预成论者A.冯·哈勒之间的交流见证了在每种世界观下为理解生殖、变态和再生而建立的强大模型。随后实验动物学的不断完善以及生物学知识的逐步进步见证了为解决特定问题而产生的不同研究传统的诞生。胚胎学、再生和变态,就像遗传学一样,确定了独立的研究课题并发展了新技术,从而形成了各自的研究轨迹。随着当前生物技术的发展,概念上的重新整合已逐渐出现。正如本次研讨会论文所揭示的,我们现在已经开始辨别出变态和再生背后共同的分子机制,并将它们重新统一起来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验