• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同超声乳化技术继发的内皮细胞丢失

Endothelial cell loss secondary to two different phacoemulsification techniques.

作者信息

Kohlhaas M, Klemm M, Kammann J, Richard G

机构信息

Universitäts-Augenklinik Hamburg Eppendorf, Germany.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998 Nov;29(11):890-5.

PMID:9824860
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The endothelial cell count after phacoemulsification serves as a sensitive indicator for the level of corneal damage caused by different phacoemulsification techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective and randomized study, the "Reversed Tip and Snip" technique and the "Divide and Conquer" technique were performed in groups of 30 patients each. The corneal endothelial cell count was measured preoperatively as well as 4 weeks and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The endothelial cell count showed significant (P < .001) reduction by approximately 10% after the "Reversed Tip and Snip" technique and by approximately 15% (P < .001) after the "Divide and Conquer" technique. The latter produced a significantly (P < .001) greater cell loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The "Reversed Tip and Snip" phacoemulsification technique produces less endothelial cell loss than the "Divide and Conquer" technique.

摘要

背景与目的

白内障超声乳化术后的内皮细胞计数是不同超声乳化技术所致角膜损伤程度的敏感指标。

患者与方法

在一项前瞻性随机研究中,分别对30例患者实施“翻转头端与剪切”技术和“分而治之”技术。术前以及术后4周和3个月测量角膜内皮细胞计数。

结果

“翻转头端与剪切”技术后内皮细胞计数显著降低(P <.001),约降低10%;“分而治之”技术后内皮细胞计数显著降低(P <.001),约降低15%。后者导致的细胞损失显著更大(P <.001)。

结论

“翻转头端与剪切”超声乳化技术比“分而治之”技术导致的内皮细胞损失更少。

相似文献

1
Endothelial cell loss secondary to two different phacoemulsification techniques.两种不同超声乳化技术继发的内皮细胞丢失
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998 Nov;29(11):890-5.
2
[Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification with the "reversed tip and snip" technique compared with the "divide and conquer" technique].与“分而治之”技术相比,采用“翻转切割头并剪断”技术进行超声乳化术后的内皮细胞损失情况
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1997 Feb;210(2):82-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035021.
3
Endothelial cell damage after cataract surgery: divide-and-conquer versus phaco-chop technique.白内障手术后的内皮细胞损伤:分而治之法与超声乳化劈核技术
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jun;34(6):996-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.02.013.
4
Corneal endothelial cell loss after cataract extraction by using ultrasound phacoemulsification versus a fluid-based system.超声乳化白内障摘除术与液基系统白内障摘除术后角膜内皮细胞损失情况比较
Cornea. 2008 Jan;27(1):17-21. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181583115.
5
[Experiences with "reversed tip and snip" phacoemulsification].["反角劈核白内障超声乳化术的经验"]
Ophthalmologe. 1998 Jul;95(7):478-81. doi: 10.1007/s003470050300.
6
Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.经1.8毫米微小切口同轴超声乳化术与经1.7毫米微小切口双手超声乳化术后早期角膜内皮细胞损失的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1570-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.014.
7
[Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification and 3.5 vs. 5 mm corneal tunnel incision].[白内障超声乳化术后内皮细胞丢失以及3.5毫米与5毫米角膜隧道切口的比较]
Ophthalmologe. 1995 Aug;92(4):476-83.
8
Corneal endothelial cell loss during phacoemulsification: bevel-up versus bevel-down phaco tip.在超声乳化术中角膜内皮细胞的丢失:向上倾斜 versus 向下倾斜的超声乳化头。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Nov;37(11):1971-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.034. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
9
[Comparative study of endothelial changes in cataract surgery with phacoemulsification technique].[白内障超声乳化手术中内皮变化的比较研究]
Oftalmologia. 2008;52(1):95-9.
10
Ultrasound energy and endothelial cell loss with stop-and-chop and nuclear preslice phacoemulsification.超声能量与“停-切”及核预劈核超声乳化术导致的内皮细胞丢失
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Oct;32(10):1661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.05.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss in Shallow Anterior Chamber Eyes After Phacoemulsification Using the Eight-Chop Technique.使用八瓣技术行白内障超声乳化术后浅前房眼中的角膜内皮细胞丢失
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 28;14(9):3045. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093045.
2
Does the phaco TIp position during clear corneal Phacoemulsification Surgery adversely affect corneal endothelium? TIPS study protocol for a randomised, triple-masked, parallel-group trial of bevel-up versus bevel-down phacoemulsification.在透明角膜超声乳化手术中,超声乳化探头的位置会对角膜内皮产生不利影响吗?一项关于向上倾斜与向下倾斜超声乳化术的随机、三盲、平行组试验的TIPS研究方案。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Jan 25;5:167. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16098.2. eCollection 2020.
3
Factors Associated with Outcomes of Combined Phacoemulsification and Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation.
白内障超声乳化吸除联合Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入术预后的相关因素
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;32(3):211-220. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2017.0105. Epub 2018 May 15.
4
Combined 30-degree bevel up and down technique against 0-degree phaco tip for phacoemulsification surgery of hard cataracts.用于硬核白内障超声乳化手术的联合30度上下倾斜技术与0度超声乳化针头对比
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 6;11:1073-1079. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S131921. eCollection 2017.
5
A Pilot Study to Propose a "Harm Scale", a New Method to Predict Risk of Harm to the Corneal Endothelium Caused by Longitudinal Phacoemulsification, and the Subsequent Effect of Endothelial Damage on Post Operative Visual Acuity.一项初步研究,旨在提出一种“损伤量表”,这是一种预测纵向超声乳化白内障吸除术对角膜内皮造成损伤风险的新方法,以及内皮损伤对术后视力的后续影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 13;11(1):e0146580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146580. eCollection 2016.
6
Effect of torsional mode phacoemulsification on cornea in eyes with/without pseudoexfoliation.扭转模式超声乳化术对有/无假性剥脱综合征的眼睛角膜的影响。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr 18;8(2):281-7. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.02.12. eCollection 2015.
7
Phaco Prechop versus Divide and Conquer Phacoemulsification: A Prospective Comparative Interventional Study.预劈核超声乳化术与分而治之超声乳化术:一项前瞻性比较干预性研究。
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jul;15(3):123-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.51987.