Laforge R G, Velicer W F, Levesque D A, Fava J L, Hill D J, Schofield P E, Fan D, De Vries H, Shisana W O, Conner M
Cancer Prevention Research Center, University of Rhode Island, Kingston 02881-0808, USA.
Tob Control. 1998 Autumn;7(3):241-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.3.241.
To explore the validity, reliability, and applicability of using a short, psychometrically sound survey instrument to measure population attitudes toward tobacco control policies.
Surveys.
Student respondents attending university in Australia (n = 403), Hong Kong (n = 336), the Netherlands (n = 351), South Africa (n = 291), the United Kingdom (n = 164) and the United States (n = 241); total n = 1786.
The Smoking Policy Inventory (SPI), a 35-item scale. SPI scores were adjusted for age, income, gender, and smoking status. Estimates of internal consistency and tests of factorial invariance were conducted in each sample.
Across all six countries, the SPI was found to be highly reliable and to have a consistent factor structure, indicating that the SPI scale represents a higher order construct that assesses general attitudes about tobacco control policy with five dimensions. In general, the degree of endorsement of anti-tobacco policies as measured by the SPI reflected the extent and strength of tobacco control legislation in those countries. Dutch students were the least likely, and Australian and Hong Kong students the most likely, to support tobacco control policies.
It is possible to develop appropriate and meaningful measurement tools for assessing support of tobacco control policies. Strong evidence was found for internal reliability and structural invariance of the SPI. The SPI may be a useful mechanism for monitoring ongoing policy initiatives, making cross-cultural comparisons, and evaluating population receptiveness to proposed policy approaches.
探讨使用一种简短、心理测量学上合理的调查工具来衡量民众对烟草控制政策态度的有效性、可靠性和适用性。
调查。
澳大利亚(n = 403)、中国香港(n = 336)、荷兰(n = 351)、南非(n = 291)、英国(n = 164)和美国(n = 241)的大学生受访者;总计n = 1786。
吸烟政策量表(SPI),一个包含35个条目的量表。SPI得分根据年龄、收入、性别和吸烟状况进行了调整。在每个样本中进行了内部一致性估计和因素不变性检验。
在所有六个国家中,SPI被发现具有高度可靠性且具有一致的因素结构,表明SPI量表代表了一个高阶结构,从五个维度评估对烟草控制政策的总体态度。总体而言,SPI衡量的反烟草政策支持程度反映了这些国家烟草控制立法的程度和力度。荷兰学生最不可能支持烟草控制政策,而澳大利亚和中国香港学生最有可能支持。
有可能开发出合适且有意义的测量工具来评估对烟草控制政策的支持。有充分证据证明SPI的内部可靠性和结构不变性。SPI可能是监测正在进行的政策举措、进行跨文化比较以及评估民众对提议政策方法接受程度的有用机制。