Suppr超能文献

慢性颈部疼痛:针灸治疗与物理治疗的比较

Chronic neck pain: a comparison of acupuncture treatment and physiotherapy.

作者信息

David J, Modi S, Aluko A A, Robertshaw C, Farebrother J

机构信息

Royal Berkshire Hospital NHS Trust and University of Reading.

出版信息

Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Oct;37(10):1118-22. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.10.1118.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture, as compared with physiotherapy, in the management of chronic neck pain.

DESIGN

Seventy adult patients with non-inflammatory neck pain of >6 weeks duration and with no abnormal neurology were randomly assigned to receive either of the treatments. Thirty-five patients were included in each group.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain by visual analogue scale and neck pain questionnaire, improvement in range of movement of neck relative to baseline, and well-being (general health questionnaire). Measurements were recorded at the start of treatment, at 6 weeks and at 6 months.

RESULTS

Both treatment groups improved in all criteria. Acupuncture was slightly more effective in patients who had higher baseline pain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Both acupuncture and physiotherapy are effective forms of treatment. Since an untreated control group was not part of the study design, the magnitude of this improvement cannot be quantified.

摘要

目的

评估针刺疗法与物理疗法相比,在治疗慢性颈部疼痛方面的有效性。

设计

七十名患有持续时间超过6周的非炎性颈部疼痛且神经功能无异常的成年患者被随机分配接受其中一种治疗。每组纳入三十五名患者。

观察指标

采用视觉模拟评分法和颈部疼痛问卷评估疼痛程度,测量颈部活动范围相对于基线的改善情况,以及健康状况(一般健康问卷)。在治疗开始时、6周时和6个月时进行记录。

结果

两个治疗组在所有标准方面均有改善。针刺疗法对基线疼痛评分较高的患者效果稍好。

结论

针刺疗法和物理疗法都是有效的治疗方式。由于未治疗的对照组未纳入研究设计,这种改善的程度无法量化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验