Suppr超能文献

救护车服务的不当使用。

Inappropriate use of the ambulance service.

作者信息

Little G F, Barton D

机构信息

Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, James Connolly Memorial Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Sep;5(3):307-11.

PMID:9827832
Abstract

To determine the rate of inappropriate use of the ambulance service a prospective study of patients brought to a Dublin accident and emergency (A&E) department by ambulance was performed over a 78-day period--358 cases were analysed representing 37% of the ambulance case load. The receiving A&E physician deemed 43.3% of cases to have a definite indication for calling an ambulance, 36.9% a relative indication and 19.8% to have no indication. A strong correlation was shown between a definite indication for transport by ambulance and admission to hospital. Acute medical illness was the most common presentation in the study group (45.8%). Patients themselves were predominant in calling for a 999 ambulance and 35.8% were deemed to have no indication for doing so. When a general practitioner requests the ambulance only 7.4% of cases had no indication for the action. Approximately one-third (31%) of 999 calls were made because the patient had no transport alternative. The problem of ambulance misuse is multifactorial and a variety of strategies are required to address the issue.

摘要

为确定救护车服务的不当使用率,对在78天内由救护车送往都柏林事故与急救(A&E)部门的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究——分析了358例病例,占救护车接诊量的37%。接收患者的A&E医生认为43.3%的病例有明确呼叫救护车的指征,36.9%有相对指征,19.8%无指征。研究表明,明确的救护车转运指征与入院之间存在很强的相关性。急性内科疾病是研究组中最常见的病症(45.8%)。患者本人拨打999救护车的情况居多,其中35.8%被认为无呼叫指征。当全科医生请求救护车时,只有7.4%的病例无此行动指征。约三分之一(31%)的999呼叫是因为患者没有其他交通方式。救护车滥用问题是多因素导致的,需要采取多种策略来解决这一问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验